The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1498 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Can I ask one more follow-up question about that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
I heard your earlier responses to Paul O’Kane. However, this is about not just funding but using the funding that has already been or will be allocated in the most effective ways and ensuring that young people’s voices are part of the discussions around that. I have had reassurance from you in that respect.
My third question is on reporting periods. Section 15 sets out the reporting duties of listed authorities and the timings of reporting cycles. The first period indicated in the bill ended on 31 March 2023, which has obviously been and gone. I note that none of the amendments that you have submitted deals with that issue. Would you be supportive of a mechanism to fix things in later stages, and do you intend to lodge an amendment to that end?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning; thank you for being here. I have a few questions on a couple of different areas, but I also want to give voice to one of the young people who has been involved in discussions around the bill. This question comes from Ellie, who is a member of the Scottish Youth Parliament:
“If the Scottish Government are going to be working out what laws are and aren’t within scope of the bill, then thinking about, over time, bringing some laws into scope, how will they be involving children and young people from the very beginning in ensuring they prioritise the most important laws?”
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
If you were to determine a hierarchy or an overriding objective, how exactly would you do that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, panel. Thank you for joining us, and thank you for the written submissions that you provided.
I am interested in exploring the detail of regulation and that kind of thing a little bit more. Professor Mayson, if I can come to you first, you said in your written contribution that the difference in the treatment of the Law Society of Scotland and the Faculty of Advocates in the proposed new framework, as category 1 and category 2 regulators, is not justified. Can you say a little bit more about that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
For my final question, I go back to Stephen Mayson. It is around transparency—I suppose that it is about transparency not only for consumers and individuals but for society more generally. Are the proposals that are aimed at increasing transparency and reporting and that kind of thing enough? Does the bill get the balance right on those issues or are there things that we should be thinking about but are not?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
We need to look upstream and make sure that we do not get to the point where people need to ask such questions. Given what you have already said, are there ways of putting in enough upstream stuff around scrutiny and regulation to ensure that nobody needs to worry about transparency, because we have sorted it?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Yes, of course.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
It was really helpful for you to set things out like that, so thank you.
Naeema, you mentioned that it was a necessary complexity to have the two-category regulator system. Is the thinking there along the same lines, or is there something else that we should be trying to get at?