The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1498 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
You mentioned some of the successes that other reopened or new rail routes have had. We are thinking about the just transition and the shift away from a fossil fuel based economy. There are obviously benefits to businesses—you have outlined some of them—but what is it specifically about rail that is so important?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
I have a final brief question for Mark Munro. Yesterday, the UK Climate Change Committee’s report “Adapting to climate change: Progress in Scotland” was published. One of its headline messages is:
“Overall progress on adapting to climate change in Scotland remains slow, particularly on delivery and implementation.”
Given that it is SNIB’s mission to achieve a just transition and net zero, where are we falling down? What is missing? I appreciate that that is a huge question for a 20-second response, but what could SNIB do differently or what do you need Parliament to do differently?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Could you give us a little more detail on the society’s view of the proposals for the two different categories of regulators to have different regulatory regimes? We heard different views about the complexity and consumers’ understanding of that, which touches on Kaukab Stewart’s earlier point. What is the society’s view of how the different regulatory regimes will work, or not?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Linked to that, what are your views on the position that category 1 regulations should not be subject to freedom of information requests and other such interrogations?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Sorry to interrupt. Will you give us a little bit more detail on your concerns about the oversight powers of the commission?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning to the panel. Thank you for joining us, and thank you for your contributions, both written and what you have said so far this morning.
I want to continue unpicking a little the issues around regulation, independent or otherwise, and the performance of the different regulators. If I can stay with Rachel Wood, that would be helpful. In relation to sections 19 and 20 of the bill, which we understand will change, although we do not know how yet, what is your view of how we will understand, regulate and assess the performance of the proposed different regulators?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
That is really helpful. Would either Morag Ross or Roddy Dunlop like to add anything to what has already been said about category 1 and 2 regulators and the different regulatory frameworks and regimes?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
I have one final question. Bill Alexander, you spoke in your opening remarks about the problematic experience of going through the application to practise. My question is not about regulation, but can you say a little more about that and about what you would like to see in sections 25 to 27 of the bill that is not already there? That is not an area that has been unpicked for us in previous evidence sessions.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Thank you, Bill—that is helpful. I will leave it there, convener.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
No, what you are saying is helpful.
On potentially supporting the manufacturing sector, which might be perceived as dwindling, is there something required in relation to our work with infrastructure projects? We heard earlier about the importance of ports, for instance. Are there places of industry—of manufacturing or fabrication—that we are not looking at in a targeted enough way?