The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1654 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Maggie Chapman
I want to explore an issue that Evelyn Tweed raised. We know that a lot of effort is put into thinking about procurement as delivering positive social, economic and environmental outcomes, as well as providing the goods and services that you all need to fulfil your functions. I am curious as to how you see those outcomes being set and determined, and about your role as procuring agents in those discussions.
Do you have clear lines of conversation with other agencies or internally in your organisations on how you can use your procurement power to tackle gender inequality, for instance? How do you see the setting or aspiration of the procurement outcomes that are not about service delivery or getting the stuff that you need?
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful, thank you.
You have all talked about the need for internal consistency with regard to training and awareness raising to ensure that people understand the idea of trying to procure for good. This might be a difficult question to answer briefly, but how often do you find that the positive outcomes that we have been talking about—the promotion of ethical goods, fair work and gender equality, the reduction of inequality and so on—are sacrificed because of cost? Also, how much of that sacrifice could be allayed by the improved consistency and coherence of training and awareness raising with regard to the longer-term social and environmental benefits of procurement?
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Maggie Chapman
Great—thanks.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Maggie Chapman
Good morning to you both. Thank you for joining us and for what you have said so far.
I want to explore some of the equalities issues that Lindsey Millen mentioned earlier. Lindsey, you said in response to a previous question that there is a distinction between using procurement, or the mechanisms that procurement enables, for tackling or addressing gender inequalities compared to equalities more generally. Will you unpack that a bit more? Are any of the mechanisms ever in conflict with each other in looking at different groups that we might want to be focused on?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Maggie Chapman
David Livey, do you want to comment?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Maggie Chapman
You talked about supporting conditionality as long as grant funders recognise that they need to provide the resources for that. What is your assessment of the extent to which grant givers and other funders understand full cost recovery? Do they understand the extent of what that means for charities and the different types of organisation that SCVO represents?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Maggie Chapman
There is a gap there for us to close.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Maggie Chapman
What is your assessment of why procurement is being used when grant funding or other mechanisms, such as service level agreements, could be used?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Maggie Chapman
What is the reason for the lack of use of reserved contracts? Is that simply because they have not been talked about? Procurement has a lot of stuff built into it and around it, so there is some work—
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Maggie Chapman
When it comes to the mechanism that could be used for that, do you think that the proportions that are given to certain criteria in the sustainable procurement duty would be the most effective way of enhancing the value that is given to sustainable procurement?