The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1498 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Thanks—that is helpful. We heard from the consumer panel of the SLCC that it broadly welcomes the simplification proposals in the bill.
Those are all my questions on that topic, but I have a final general one.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Okay. However, that split retains some of the complexity of the system, which is one of the challenges that Fulton MacGregor and others have alluded to. There is also an issue with the SLCC’s assertion that it requires additional powers with regard to both entering its information in a timely way and things such as setting minimum standards. There are questions about whether there are sufficient checks and balances to ensure that the SLCC does not abuse those additional powers. Are there sufficient checks and balances or should we be looking at anything else?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Thanks for your comments so far, minister. I have a couple of questions on the SLCC, on the new body that the bill proposes to establish and on the processes involved.
First, the SLCC considers that, in what is outlined in the bill, the responsibility for dealing with complaints remains split between bodies and that professional bodies might have a conflict of interest. How do you respond to those challenges?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Okay, thank you. I have another question but it is on a different issue, convener.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. That is helpful.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
We have heard from different witnesses during our evidence gathering that some of the reforms in the bill are long overdue. We often focus on the areas of disagreement, as we have done in the past couple of weeks. Given those aspects on which there is clear and high-profile disagreement, what is your assessment of the possibility that we will not get to a point at which we can agree to the principles of the bill? Should that happen, who would win and who would lose, given that some people have been waiting for 16 or 17 years for some of the reforms?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, minister. Thank you for being here this morning. I have a quick question on issues that could have arisen after the transition period.
Given the commitment to alignment that the Scottish Government has made, are there measures in place that we can take independent of the UK legislature on cost savings beyond transition, or is that it? Essentially, I am asking whether there is a way that we can continue to be aligned with the likes of Iceland, Norway and Switzerland beyond the cut-off period.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Maggie Chapman
Okay. Therefore, I suppose that the issue is that the checks and balances that you outline—I understand what they are—are retrospective in many ways. I am thinking about what would happen before we got to the point when those measures needed to be invoked. Is there enough certainty that those processes would ensure that the new commission would not—I am not saying abuse the powers—act in a way that was not congruent with the principles of the bill and those powers?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, minister. Thank you for joining us. Given what you said about the limited criteria and starting small, with the potential to expand the criteria over time on the basis of lessons learned, I am interested in how we ensure that people who might benefit from the mental health moratorium and people who might give support or advice to debtors on it and on mental health or financial issues will be aware of exactly what the moratorium entails and the criteria. What mechanisms do you have in mind for ensuring awareness among mental health professionals, those in the money advice sector and others who support people with financial or mental health difficulties?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
When you say “awareness across the sector”, do you mean the money advice sector, mental health professionals or both?