The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1719 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
I put that question to the other witnesses. Given the sensitivities, tensions and potential conflicts that some of you have identified, how will society be able to support children to express their rights, as enshrined in the UNCRC, particularly those in articles 12 and 14?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks very much for that. It is important to note that, just because things are not brought to the surface, it does not mean that they are not rumbling underneath. Some of the examples that you have given highlight the broader issues of stigmatisation, othering and just not feeling like you belong, whether they are raised by parent or child. We will consider that carefully as we gather our evidence on the bill.
Do witnesses have any other comments on the rights?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Dr Sanchez, you have been quite clear that, in your view, the mandating of RO is the main issue, and that the distinction between RO and RME is important.
Fraser, what would your solution be, if not the provisions in the bill? Given the guidance and the statutory obligations that exist, where should the conversation about rights for parents and guardians and children and young people go? We heard quite a lot of tension about children being pitted against their parents or guardians and the consequences that that can have, especially if there are issues of family separation and so on. We also heard about the idea of enabling spiritual development in a way that is right for the individual, rather than saying, “This is how it has to happen.” Can you see a way through that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
You are looking at the statutory enforcement route.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks to you both.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful. We heard in the earlier sessions this morning about some of the challenges that schools might face in facilitating such discussions. For example, anxiety may be expressed by both parents and children, or by either parents or children, in different situations. They may be anxious about even raising the issue, because they do not want to be stigmatised and show themselves to be different in some way or another.
We heard earlier about some good examples of where such conversations are handled very sensitively and cleverly in some respects. How do we ensure that there is no stigmatisation and no risk of othering? There is a risk that the issue may not be raised in a conversation at all, because children do not want to annoy their parents, and parents do not want to shine the spotlight on the child as “other”.
Do you have any further thoughts on that? What you have said is fine—I just wondered whether you wanted to add anything else.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, everyone. I am sorry that I cannot join you in person, but greetings from sunny Dundee.
Angela O’Hagan, you talked about the gap between narrative and practice and about the lack of fluency. One of the reasons why the committee started this process was to try to identify how we could close those gaps. What is your analysis or understanding of why there are still those gaps and the lack of fluency that you described?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Sorry—I muted myself to cough and then realised that I could not unmute myself.
I will leave it there, convener. I am happy to pass over to others, and I will come in again if something else sparks a question.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
We have heard about the tools that are available to you and your colleagues throughout the different levels of local and central Government. The national outcomes are one of those key tools. However, the national outcomes and national performance framework do not always match up. We cannot always follow the thread through from the NPF, budgets or the programme for government to the delivery of outcomes. Will you, minister or cabinet secretary, say more about how the Government is trying to follow those things through more concretely? What is your assessment of the delay in refreshing some of the national outcomes?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you very much.