The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1719 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
And all the safety issues.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. You may have heard, in the earlier evidence session, quite a lot of discussion about the potential conflict between parents’ rights as primary educators of their children and children’s rights to free expression of their spiritual or religious development in ways that suit them.
The Scottish Government’s view of the bill is that the new process would better support UNCRC articles 12 and 14 on the right to be heard and on freedom of thought, conscience and religion. How do you see that intention to give those rights legitimacy in our laws, alongside the potential conflict with parents’ rights to be primary educators?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks very much. My final question perhaps follows on from some of Pam Gosal’s questions about consistency and the issues across the board. I hear the views about whether or not we should have RO but, given that we do, how best can headteachers, schools, local authorities and others who are having the high-level conversations about it ensure consistency, so that—as you were saying, Fraser—the principles of inclusion, non-stigmatising and non-othering processes are universally understood? How would you go about doing that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Yes, but as long as we have it, would that be the route?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Okay, that is helpful. Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks, Rachel. That is really helpful. It is important for us to bear that in mind as we consider the bill. You mentioned the child’s increase in agency and the receding of parental rights as that happens. What mechanism do you envisage will enable that to be supported? Is it statutory guidance for schools, or training and support for teachers? Do we have the mechanisms in place or will they be enabled by the bill? Do we need to look at something else that will support that shift and the transfer of responsibility, I suppose, from the parent and state to the child?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful. I saw Angela O’Hagan nodding vehemently as you were speaking. Angela, do you want to come back in on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is really helpful. Elaine, do you want to comment on that? You do not have to, but you are welcome to if you want to add anything.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. I thank Stephen Allison for his comments, which I echo. I was appalled by the situation that Leah Rivka described. That should not happen in any school in any situation.
Barbara Coupar, you said that it was interesting and important that this conversation is taking place at the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee rather than at the Education, Children and Young People Committee because of the foundation of rights that underpins not only the proposals in the bill but the broader conversation. Could you say a little bit more about the conversation that takes place within Catholic education and Catholic schools on the rights in the UNCRC—in particular, article 12, on the right for young people to be heard, and article 14, on freedom of expression and freedom of religion? How do you draw those into the discussion, given some of the tensions and sensitivities that we have mentioned?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you—that was helpful. I suppose that we are talking about some of the tensions that folk have outlined. If there was strong disagreement between a child and their parent about how they wanted to develop their spirituality, their freedom of expression or their freedom of belief, how would you facilitate conversations about that?