The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1571 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. I turn to John Wilkes. What difference do you think that such a bill could or should make to Scotland?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
Do you want to say anything more about the powers, or should I move seamlessly on to Angela O’Hagan?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
Thank you—that was helpful.
I turn to Angela O’Hagan. Given where the SHRC has been over the past several years, not only in the bill process but in the work that you have undertaken to focus on areas of failure, which I suppose is what we are talking about, what difference would the bill have made? Why were so many hopes pinned on it?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
I could go on, but I probably should not do so. I simply want to highlight what you said about the fact that all of us in this place are guarantors of everybody’s human rights. I do not think that all 129 of us think of ourselves in that way, and maybe we need to.
10:30Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
Thanks, Alan. That point about culture was raised a few times earlier, as well. It is clearly very important.
11:30Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
Will you elaborate on that a little? You talked about the failures of the current equalities mechanisms and said that the duties do not actually work because they are too narrow. You also said something about the challenges of mainstreaming and how we understand that. We heard earlier from Angela O’Hagan about some of the failures of mainstreaming in the broad rights and equalities landscape. How could the proposed legislation have allowed us to take a view that was not different to mainstreaming but would enable that embedding—I was going to use the word “foundationing”; sorry, that is a terrible word—that would make us take human rights and equality seriously from the start rather than see them as an add-on or as something fluffy and extra down the line?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
The committee has talked about the fact that certain groups of people might have easier or better access to rights than others. Does Amnesty face particular challenges in the work that it does with immigrants—people who have come here for a range of reasons, by choice or otherwise—that such a bill could have supported you with? We talk about human rights as a universal concept, but we do not apply human rights universally. Could you say a bit more about that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
Good morning. I thank the witnesses for being here this morning and for everything that they have outlined they have done in this space so far.
I am interested in teasing out why everybody thinks that the bill is such an important piece of legislation. The simple question is what difference such a bill would make. In your answers, could you think about where there are deficiencies in the current human rights landscape in Scotland, and whether those are deficiencies of law, service provision or implementation of policies or strategies? Until we learned that there was not going to be a bill in this session, we heard that so much hope was pinned on this piece of legislation. What difference do you think that the bill could have or should have made for Scotland because of existing deficiencies and gaps in the landscape? I put that to all of you. I do not know who wants to go first.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Maggie Chapman
I will pick up on your last statement that public bodies would have to prioritise human rights—that there would be the risk of legal action if they did not. Emma Hutton might want to come back on this point as well. On access to justice, does the current landscape allow individuals to seek remedy, which has instead to be done through organisations or some other mechanism?