The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1571 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Maggie Chapman
That is fine. Given the committee’s interest and what the minister said about keeping a close eye on the matter, I wonder if reasonably regular—not frequent, but regular—updates on progress over the coming year would be useful.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Maggie Chapman
On a related but different issue, the Law Society has said that the Scottish Law Commission also might have some issues with part 1 of the act as drafted. Is that part of the same conversations? What do you see as the commission’s influence or role in those conversations? If it cannot influence things, why is it there?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, minister and officials. Thank you for coming and for what you have said so far this morning. My first question, which might be more appropriate for Nel Whiting than for the minister, relates to the FGM act and follows on from Pam Gosal’s questions about data collection and the on-going preparatory work. We know that some data is already being collected. NHS Lothian’s Alnisa service reported a 50 per cent increase in FGM cases in 2023, so clearly it is collecting some data. Is there an understanding of what has driven that increase? Is it because of the awareness that was raised around the FGM act and its passage through Parliament, or is it due to the multi-agency work that you have done? Are we asking the right questions in the right places to make sure that we are collecting the right data?
I heard what you said earlier about work on implementation starting in earnest next year, but could you say a little bit more about that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful, thank you. Could you give an indication of what work you are doing around some of the multi-agency guidance?
In response to one of Pam Gosal’s questions, you said that some of the work on data collection had been paused. Given what you have said about the groups that you have brought together, I am interested in how you think the multi-agency work on guidance—particularly on FGM protection orders—will be tackled. Is the guidance going to be issued in 2026, all at once, or is there a way of phasing some of that work in order to reach organisations, third sector partners and others that might support or come into contact with minoritised communities?
How do the FGM protection orders fit in to the next few months of work?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Maggie Chapman
I thank the minister and Jeff Gibbons for their comments so far. This question might be for you, Jeff. You referred to some of the information that we have received from Police Scotland and other organisations in advance of today’s session. Police Scotland said that the Scottish Government could be considering legislative amendments to part 1 of the 2021 act. Can you say a little more about how you see that happening, and what sort of plans you have in place for that? Are you looking for a vehicle for those amendments? Could that be done through secondary legislation? Do you agree with Police Scotland’s assessment that changes are needed?
10:45Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Maggie Chapman
I have a quick question, which might be best directed to Simon Stockwell.
Minister, you talked in your opening remarks about how we can support children in giving evidence and participating in processes. What have we learned from the bairns’ hoose model? Is there stuff that we can translate across from it? After all, really good work can happen in one bit of a world, but it does not always find its way across departmental or other boundaries. Are there things that we can learn from the bairns’ hoose approach that will allow us to support children and young people to be part of the process in a safe and supported way?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Maggie Chapman
I just thought that some of the cultural stuff, if not the process stuff, around the bairns’ hoose model might be quite useful. I would be interested to know more as those discussions progress over the coming months.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Maggie Chapman
If there are barriers related to existing institutional structures or remits, are conversations about that part of the mix?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Maggie Chapman
Thank you, minister. Just before I pass to Marie McNair, I will pick up on something that you said in your opening remarks, which you said before when it became clear that the LDAN bill was not going forward in this year’s programme for government. You said that one of the reasons for that was the strong and diverse views on some key issues.
However, it was clear from the evidence that we took last week that there is a lot of unanimity and consensus on some of what needs to be done. Will you explain what you see those differences of views as being? Have other pressures influenced the decision not to progress with the bill at this time?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Maggie Chapman
I move to questions from Pam Gosal.