The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1719 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks for that, Lorne.
Are there any specific issues or questions that we need to be asking or to be aware of in order to ensure that human rights due diligence is understood by businesses, particularly those that should be providing the kind of support for people with learning disabilities that you have described?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you very much. You have highlighted the barriers to accessing education at all, never mind culturally appropriate education. I come to Lorne Berkley on the same question.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you, Lucy. I will leave it there for now, convener.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
Convener, do you want me to come in?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you, Lorne. That is helpful.
Charlie McMillan, do you have any comments on the point about public bodies and businesses engaging with the content of the mandatory human rights due diligence? I also have a question about action plans, which follows up on your earlier comments.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
I am in two minds about this, but given what the minister has said and the future that Bob Doris’s amendment may or may not bring, I will withdraw—or rather, not press—my amendment at this stage.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, convener, committee, and minister. Thank you for the opportunity to give a brief recap of my amendments 1022 and 1069 in this group.
Amendment 1022, which was worked up with Scottish Women’s Aid, expands the definition of domestic violence to cover coercive control and other aspects such as threatening, degrading and violent behaviour. We feel that that is important because certain groups of people, particularly young people and, often, women with children, might feel that they cannot leave an abusive situation as they would be intentionally making themselves homeless. We need to ensure that they have the support and protections that they need.
Specific examples of abuse and violence perpetrated by someone who is not a partner or ex-partner also need to be included in the legislation—indeed, that is the second part of amendment 1022. The more we can identify domestic abuse in our homelessness systems, the better we can help victims and survivors and support them to move on and build better lives. That is helped by having the wider definition.
Amendment 1069 seeks to understand how this section of the bill will work. We know that it is important to monitor how these measures will support women with children at risk of homelessness, and the amendment, therefore, sets out a review mechanism to ensure that we capture information so that we can see what is and is not working and improve things for the future.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
Not moved. Thank you. [Laughter.] I knew it was one of those words.
Amendment 1067 not moved.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
The homelessness provisions in the bill are potentially game changing, but they could quite easily fall flat if they are not properly resourced and monitored. Pilots of some of the key provisions are being planned, and we will learn from those. Given the complexity of some of the provisions, it is important that we step back and review how things are working out at dedicated points after commencement and enactment, and that is what my amendments 1067 and 1074 seek to enable.
Amendment 1067 provides for a review of specific
“duties of relevant bodies ... within 2 years of the date that section 41 comes into force”.
It is about ensuring that the relevant bodies are working in the way that the bill intends them to work and that they have the resources and the connections and relationships that they need.
Amendment 1074 provides for a review of the whole of part 5 of the act
“within 2 years of this Part coming into force”.
Again, it is about ensuring that the bill does the things that we all hope that it will to tackle homelessness and provide support to people who need it.
I am open to conversations with the Scottish Government about whether the mechanisms and timescales in my amendments are the right ones, but I hope that we can agree today that the principle of review—the principle that we should seriously and rigorously review this section of the bill post commencement—is important, and I look forward to hearing what the minister has to say in response.
I wholly support the other amendments in the group, in particular those in the name of Mark Griffin.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
On a point of order, convener. I should have noted my entry in the register of members’ interests at the start of the meeting. Prior to my election, I worked for a rape crisis centre. I have said that at previous meetings, but I forgot to do so this morning. I apologise.