The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1719 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Okay.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks. That is helpful. I will leave it there.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, and thank you for joining us.
I am interested in exploring a little more about how things work now, and what the bill could do. What do the young people you work with tell you about the right to withdraw from RO and RME—I take the point about their conflation in this bill—and how it currently works? What is your view on that?
Juliet, I will start with you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is exactly one of the things that we heard from our witnesses last week—that schools are not necessarily equipped to deal with this. That might be one reason why they do not make too much of an issue of it.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
I will come to Gavin Yates and Louise Church soon. Gina, you talked about the evidence that we have had from children about their experience, and their families’ experiences, of discrimination. Are you aware of any evidence of parents or children worrying about being othered or further stigmatised if they take a position on the issue of withdrawal from RO?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
What do you think, Gavin?
09:45Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks, Louise. That is really helpful. My final question is to any panel member. You have all said in different ways that we do not have evidence of high numbers of withdrawals in the process as it currently works. That could be because of a lack of awareness, stigmatisation or because not withdrawing is the path of least resistance, to use Gavin Yates’s phrase. Should we be gathering and monitoring data on withdrawals? The approach feels quite piecemeal; there is no requirement to record the number of withdrawals and there is no formal data gathering by local authorities. What are your views on whether we should have a clearer data-driven understanding of this? Alternatively, does data not have a role in something like this?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Louise Church, is there anything else that you want to add about how things are working at the moment or how we record information?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Okay. Thanks, folks—I will leave my questions there.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
You talk about feedback and consultation, but I see those as being quite different from engagement. I see engagement as being much more co-productive. It involves having conversations that are not about discussing something that is already predetermined by university management or—