The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1488 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning to the witnesses. Thank you for joining us this morning and for your comments so far.
You have all identified a gap between process and outcomes, and a failure to understand the connections. Given that one of the reasons for this inquiry is the lack of other levers to consider changing outcomes and making human rights and equalities real for people, where are the failures in that implementation gap? We have talked a bit about understanding, but we also heard questions about lack of accountability and leadership. Why does the public sector equality duty as we have it now not work? Rohini Sharma Joshi, I will start with you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Rohini, what are your views on Age Scotland’s understanding of, or work with, the third need of fostering good relations?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
You talked about the failure overall to address inequalities for disabled people. The PSED is only one lever in the range of available measures. I am wary of stepping on colleagues’ toes—I know that others want to come in on these issues, too—but is the understanding of what equalities actually means underpinning some of the failure? If so, what needs to change? Given the lack of action for years, is there something particular going on for disabled people?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
You mentioned the idea of using the tools earlier on—in other words, starting from the equality impact assessment approach and looking at existing structural inequalities and so on. Do you think that that would help us to get into the nuts and bolts of what you described as the “bread and butter” of everyday life—housing, education and healthcare—rather than specific issues that relate to specific protected characteristic groups?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
I see that Pauline Nolan wants to come back in.
11:30Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks very much. Others want to come in on the subject, too, so I will leave it at that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning. Thank you for joining us and for your comments so far.
The difference between the presentations that you are giving us and what we heard last week is quite stark. To an extent, that is one of the reasons why we are undertaking this inquiry. Without the opportunities that we were hoping for during the human rights bill discussions, the PSED is something that we can focus on. We can look at where the duties are not being met.
I was interested in what Clare Gallagher said in her answer to Karen Adam’s question. We are failing on the intersectional aspects and we are failing to understand the complexities of the duties. Do you see that failure as being because the focus is on the process rather than on the outcome? Does that need to be addressed in the reforms? Others around the table will explore the reforms in more detail later, but is the reason for failure that distinction between process and outcomes?
09:45Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Do you think that some of that is down to a lack of data or to not collecting the right type of data?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Do the reforms that are currently under discussion go far enough?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks, Jatin.
I ask the same question of Jill Wood, about the gap between process and outcome, and whether the PSED is delivering the outcomes that it was thought it could deliver.