The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1719 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
What would help build the capacity of the community to continue with those discussions and with engagement, vision and processes—with being and creating the “just Grangemouth” that you want to be?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
How do we ensure that contracted workers and the transient workforce are brought into those conversations? What do we need to do?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
Pat Rafferty and Dominic Pritchard talked about Burntisland Fabrications. Given the job losses that have happened over successive periods, what should the Scottish Government and other public bodies and agencies do to prevent that kind of job loss from happening again at BiFab or equivalent sites elsewhere?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. I will pick up on a couple of points in Unite’s submission, which states that the just transition “must be worker led”. You have also talked about some of the issues that you face. Will you give us more detail about what worker leadership looks like, what is missing and what we can do to ensure that we get a worker-led just transition?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
Are you sure that you want that on the record? [Laughter.]
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
Dominic Pritchard, you talked about companies’ failure to recognise trade unions. Other than applying political pressure, what role do you see for us in supporting a worker-led just transition?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
What can we do to help with that? You are right that it is a challenge. If the Grangemouth model is working, how can we transfer it? What are the barriers that prevent that happening?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Maggie Chapman
I will do the same—I am a member of Unite.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2023
Maggie Chapman
I agree with the sentiment that Karen Adam just expressed. Because of the petition, we have been able to consider Makaton and some other issues that we might not have considered before.
Thinking specifically about the petition, I know that we can close it, keep it open or widen the work around it. My concern with closing it now, as it stands, is that I am not sure whether that closes the loop for the petitioner. We sent her the Scottish Government’s response, but I would like to give her the opportunity to come back to us with any final comments.
I also think that there is something in that wider work that Karen talked about. The balance that we see in the papers between the issues of accessibility and judicial rigour is really important—the line is quite narrow, in some ways. I would like to see us explore, not only in the area of justice but in other areas, how we can bring Makaton much more into our understanding of accessible communication and the knock-on consequences for the public services that we rely on.
I would like us to keep the petition open for now in order to give Sandra Docherty an opportunity to come back to us, but I would also like us to say that we see the petition as kicking off a wider body of work. Then, in the coming weeks or months, or however long it takes, we can see how to take that forward.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning to all of you who have joined us this morning; thank you for being here.
Following on from Colin Beattie’s questions, I might have different views of some of the new technologies that you have just talked about, Stuart, and the risks associated with them, particularly in relation to the potential displacement of activity and resource for technologies that we know are carbon neutral now. You talked about the different facets of the petrochemical industries. There is a continued drag on carbon emissions because of a continued reliance of CCUS and hydrogen on that petrochemical extraction.
One question that I am interested in is the need for test sites—demonstration sites—which is talked about in the just transition commission report. What is your view of the risks of what we currently have at Grangemouth and the risks of the different technologies that we have either not been proving or not been trying to prove the concept of over the past 20 years? What new and genuinely carbon-neutral technologies have potential at Grangemouth?