The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1571 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thank you; that is really helpful. Part of my question is motivated by comments that have been made by service providers that are funded through different strands of Scottish Government funding around the resource spending review. They are looking at some of the directions of travel that were laid out in the review. I know that matters have moved on—sometimes in the wrong direction, for the reasons that you outlined—in the intervening six months; however, there is concern around decisions being taken without an understanding of the consequences in terms of material outcomes. Other members might want to pick upon that.
You mentioned the national performance framework. Linking that to where we consider we should be, how do you see the national performance framework giving us the outcomes that we want? Pam Duncan-Glancy will come in later to talk about the issue of minimum core outcomes when we are dealing with such questions, but it seems to me that we do not always understand the consequences of the decisions that we take here. I am curious to know whether you think that we are moving in the right direction, because I do not think that we have everything in place yet.
Where do you see the pressure points, and where we need a bit more intervention to better understand the consequences of financial decisions?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Maggie Chapman
You have all mentioned the people shortage in different ways, but the fact is that some of that is not within our control. What would you like us to do to try to make welding and other fabrication jobs more attractive?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Maggie Chapman
Ian, I must apologise for mixing you and Paul Sheerin up earlier. Does your sector have same the mismatch with regard to the skills and labour balance, or are there just gaps everywhere?
10:15Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Maggie Chapman
Good morning. I thank the witnesses for their comments so far.
I wonder whether David Thomson could unpick that 9.1 per cent figure for vacancies. Does it relate directly to specific types of jobs? Earlier, you said that 95 per cent of the businesses that you represent are small to medium sized, but what is the variation in that figure across the organisations and businesses that you represent?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful. It sometimes strikes me that, when we try to grapple with the mismatch between labour and skills shortages and vacancies, we are trying to fix the problem with solutions that will not be fit for the future. Given that you have introduced the issue of automation and how we shift the way in which business works, what focused support would you like to see in the Scottish Government’s budget in those areas to pull together the vacancy, labour and skills gaps? After all, automation could significantly transform how we do what we do and how you manufacture what you manufacture.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thanks. I was going to ask what engagement you had had with SDS, so it is good to hear those comments.
Euan, do you want to respond to the same questions on the mismatch of skills?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Maggie Chapman
Ian Laird, I think that you said that up to a third of businesses are thinking of reducing their size and letting people go—or potentially closing—given the cost issues that they face.
I am sorry—it might have been Paul Sheerin who said that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Maggie Chapman
What would be the knock-on consequences for employment more generally as a result of that? Is there a tension between that and people wanting to work? I accept what has been said about the shifts in people’s approaches to employment, but how are you balancing those tensions?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. I want to start the conversation with questions of process and how we define and describe the process of human rights thinking in our budget decisions.
Oonagh Brown said in her opening statement that centring people with lived experience in the process is important. One challenge with access is that inclusion and participation, which are a cornerstone of realising rights, sometimes seem impossible because of the time that budgeting processes take. What would a transparent, inclusive and accessible process look like for you and the people whom you work with and support?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful. It is very useful for us that you have pointed out some of your strategies and documents, just now and in your written submission.
My next question is for Clare Gallagher and is on similar lines. Oonagh Brown rightly pointed out how inaccessible the resource spending review documentation and process can be, and we need to learn from that. Clare, from your work at CEMVO, what is your assessment of how we can learn from looking backwards compared to taking a purely forward-looking approach? It is about a revisionist approach versus saying that what we have does not work so we should create something new. How do we get the best of both approaches?