The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1943 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful. We have heard about that need for training or just for better awareness and societal education and literacy about what is available and what is not. I will leave it there—thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. I will leave it there for now, convener.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Can I ask one more follow-up question about that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
I heard your earlier responses to Paul O’Kane. However, this is about not just funding but using the funding that has already been or will be allocated in the most effective ways and ensuring that young people’s voices are part of the discussions around that. I have had reassurance from you in that respect.
My third question is on reporting periods. Section 15 sets out the reporting duties of listed authorities and the timings of reporting cycles. The first period indicated in the bill ended on 31 March 2023, which has obviously been and gone. I note that none of the amendments that you have submitted deals with that issue. Would you be supportive of a mechanism to fix things in later stages, and do you intend to lodge an amendment to that end?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning; thank you for being here. I have a few questions on a couple of different areas, but I also want to give voice to one of the young people who has been involved in discussions around the bill. This question comes from Ellie, who is a member of the Scottish Youth Parliament:
“If the Scottish Government are going to be working out what laws are and aren’t within scope of the bill, then thinking about, over time, bringing some laws into scope, how will they be involving children and young people from the very beginning in ensuring they prioritise the most important laws?”
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
If you were to determine a hierarchy or an overriding objective, how exactly would you do that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, panel. Thank you for joining us, and thank you for the written submissions that you provided.
I am interested in exploring the detail of regulation and that kind of thing a little bit more. Professor Mayson, if I can come to you first, you said in your written contribution that the difference in the treatment of the Law Society of Scotland and the Faculty of Advocates in the proposed new framework, as category 1 and category 2 regulators, is not justified. Can you say a little bit more about that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
For my final question, I go back to Stephen Mayson. It is around transparency—I suppose that it is about transparency not only for consumers and individuals but for society more generally. Are the proposals that are aimed at increasing transparency and reporting and that kind of thing enough? Does the bill get the balance right on those issues or are there things that we should be thinking about but are not?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Maggie Chapman
We need to look upstream and make sure that we do not get to the point where people need to ask such questions. Given what you have already said, are there ways of putting in enough upstream stuff around scrutiny and regulation to ensure that nobody needs to worry about transparency, because we have sorted it?