The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1654 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Maggie Chapman
Fulton, you broke up a little there. Ali and Luis, did you get the question, or do you want Fulton to repeat it?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Maggie Chapman
Good morning. Thank you for being here and for what you have already told us. I want to focus on two areas: I will drill down into progress on participation rates in the labour market, and the action plan and targets.
On participation rates, we have heard already this morning that there has been progress, but we cannot necessarily pinpoint what has been successful, or why it has been successful in certain places. I will pick up on a couple of things.
First, what do you need to know in order to identify what is and is not working, and are you confident that we have a plan to get that information? There are the raw numbers, but Michelle Thomson talked about the culture; there is something other than just the numbers.
I have a couple of other questions that might relate to Colin Smyth’s and Jamie Halcro Johnston’s points about there being a postcode lottery. The participation figure is a nationwide figure. Are you sure that it is not masking further inequality, either in geographic areas or in sectors? Since the call for views, we have had a response from NHS Tayside’s disability employment network that says that the gap seems to be widening again after initial progress. Can you drill down into that a bit more so that we understand the sectoral and geographical variations, and the intersectional issues, such as whether older disabled people are more disadvantaged than younger disabled people, for instance? Can you say a bit more about those matters?
10:30Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Maggie Chapman
I suppose that that links to the point about progress on the action plan and the targets. You have identified very clearly that we are on course, at the moment. Do you sense that we will continue with that linear progress, or is there a possibility that it will either speed up or hit a plateau? What is the assessment of the rate of progress over the next 15 years?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Maggie Chapman
You have talked about the importance of culture change. I think that there is a balance to be struck between supporting people at different stages of their lives and supporting and encouraging culture change among employers. Do you see a challenge in respect of the person-centred support that the policies and plans are based on and broader structural and systemic matters? This might relate to the joined-upness that we need in the data, and to how we think about enhanced inclusion for everyone. Where do you see the balance being between focusing on support for the individual and making structural changes, whether in making sure that there is inclusive transport in rural areas, or whatever? How do we get that balance right and how do we get joined-upness across the Government? That is not only your responsibility; it connects to so many other areas.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Maggie Chapman
I am struck by what you have said about recognition. Recently, we have seen quite a lot of information relating to racial profiling in the police, for instance, and on-going work to improve that, but reports keep coming back that our police service uses racial profiling. What would such accountability look like for the police specifically or any other public agency?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Maggie Chapman
Pinar, did you want to come in?
12:30Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Maggie Chapman
Welcome, everybody, and thank you for joining us. In our first panel this morning, we heard about the mismatch between fine words, policies and strategies and actually delivering accountable actions on the ground to change Scotland’s approach to racism and to challenge the underlying systemic racist society in which we live.
Graham, you picked up on some specific issues with the UK Government and Home Office, and how they are, in your words, profoundly racist. From a Scottish perspective, what avenues should the Scottish Parliament be working on to support the people with whom you work? I ask Pinar to come in after your response.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Maggie Chapman
What would that look like?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Maggie Chapman
That is okay. Obviously, there is a barrier. There is a gap between the recommendations and what we know is wrong, and overcoming that barrier or hurdle. What are we—the Scottish Government, the Scottish Parliament and politicians—doing wrong, and how can we overcome—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2023
Maggie Chapman
It is about the systemic and ingrained racism in Scottish society.