The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1829 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
How is your engagement with the trade unions working if that is their position? You say that you want to improve the culture and you want to be transparent, but there has clearly been a breakdown in communication.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
It is helpful to know that that material is being collated, looked at and stress tested. How do you see it fitting into conversations with the SFC and others about the longer-term recovery plan?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
I might pick up on some of those points again in a little while, but I want to follow up on the point about the sense of community. How do you respond to what we have heard from DUSA that students are concerned about the impact that they see that all this is having on the people who are teaching them, supporting them, making sure that the labs work, and so on? What would you say to DUSA, either directly or indirectly through us?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
I want to go back to the issue of the university engaging with staff and building and sustaining relationships with them. What is your understanding of fair work?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
So, will there be a £50,000 grant and a £12,000 loan?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Okay. My final question comes back to the point of culture. You have talked about the personal and professional trauma that staff have gone through. UCU told us that around 70 per cent of staff who completed the survey are seeking support for poor mental health. We have heard that critical views are being silenced through acts of intimidation, including being identified publicly, that decisions continue to be made behind closed doors and that proper procedures are not always followed.
Those are just some examples, but there are more. I think that staff feel gaslit sometimes, quite frankly, but I know that that is not your intention. We have heard fine words in response to questions from Pam Duncan-Glancy and others today. How are you going to turn that around? It seems that we need to move beyond fine words about what we want in the university community—dignity, humanity and trust—but the question is, how do we do that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
People who have raised issues are being picked on or identified so that they could be picked on. They now feel more vulnerable than they did before.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, cabinet secretary and officials. Thank you for joining us this morning. I have a couple of questions on slightly different but related points. I will stick with part 1 for now. Many stakeholders have said that the bill conflates religious observance with religious and moral education. Although that is the case in existing legislation, we have heard quite a lot of very clear evidence and very strong support for the view that it should not be possible to opt out of RME, because of its value and its educational role in our society. Why did the Government not take the opportunity with this legislation to make that distinction in law and say, “RME is core to our curriculum and we will not have young people opting out, whether it is them or their parents doing that, because it is a fundamental area of our education”?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. Those comments are useful, and they reinforce what Marie McNair said about the need for clear guidance on interpretation so that children and young people are not forced to take that step to seek clarification of whether an exemption should apply through the courts. We do not want our young people to have to do that. I hope that we would have systems in place that deal with some of those issues before court actions and court decisions are required. That was a helpful clarification.
Cabinet secretary, my final question relates to something that you said in your letter to the committee, in which you talked about engagement with the UK Government to explore the
“removal of any legislative restrictions that currently limit the Scottish Parliament’s ability to enhance human rights protections”.
You said that if there was no progress within the next 12 months, the Scottish Government would commission a review of UK acts. Can you say a little bit more about the rationale for the 12-month period and how those conversations with the UK Government are going?
11:15Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
I was not suggesting that RME be put on a statutory footing.