The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1969 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I lodged amendment 307 because we have a real David-versus-Goliath situation in our communities. The likes of Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks, hydrogen production companies, wind farm developers, Moray FLOW-Park and so on are all multimillion pound companies with deep pockets, and they are bankrolling renewable developments while community groups have to go up against them using their own money, donations, crowdfunding or whatever they can find to protect their communities from what they feel is environmental harm. There is a tremendous impact on those communities, and they do not have much recourse to address the injustice.
Amendment 307 would therefore instruct the Scottish ministers to establish a scheme to ensure that community voices are represented and heard. It would send a strong message to communities across Scotland that we stand with them and we stand for fairness. There is an issue with the current situation and, although amendment 307 might not be perfect, I am trying to open up a conversation about whether there is a better way of doing things so that communities can stand up against some of the big developments.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Will the cabinet secretary take an intervention?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I will follow on from Ross Greer’s intervention. Cabinet secretary, last week at the NZET Committee, you said that you see section 40 of the 2014 act and the Ecocide (Scotland) Bill dovetailing. That does not prevent our making changes to section 40 of the 2014 act. We might have an ecocide act or we might not, but I am struggling to see why that would prevent our making changes to the 2014 act now.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I accept that changes to the legal system are happening that would allow community groups more access. That is great, but is there any timetable for it to happen?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I accept that—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Yes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I would say that the word “negligence” suggests that you do not know what you are doing, and that is a problem.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
With regard to vicarious liability, what is your view of contractors that do work for the main company, for example?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Therefore, you think that, if a company is following a proper process, it is the contracting company that—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Could the bill have any unintended consequences? For example, is there any danger of companies moving their headquarters away from Scotland because there is an ecocide law in place?