The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1616 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I will be quick, convener.
Looking online just now, I see that there are three areas that have been in overflow for 48 hours: Dunoon, Largs and Aberdour. Would that be causing pollution at this time?
Simon, you seemed to suggest that just because there has been an overflow situation for the past 48 hours, that does not mean that it is causing pollution. Is that right?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
ESS received some criticisms last year in the “Report on ERCS’s first 11 representations to Environmental Standards Scotland” by the Environmental Rights Centre for Scotland. They include criticisms that you are taking too long following representations to decide whether to investigate and that you are relying exclusively on using informal resolution rather than exercising enforcement powers such as issuing compliance notices. What is your reaction to that criticism?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Would you like that work to go faster? Are you taking into consideration what SEPA went through and the resources that it has?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I guess that resolving issues informally rather than going through compliance is a success story, rather than a criticism.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
One of the examples that the ERCS used was the amount of time that SEPA was given to comply with its legal duties regarding the public register. Will you provide more detail on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I have a question about local authorities. The last time that we had the ESS in, you were supportive of the Scottish Government’s plans to mandate local authorities to report on scope 3 emissions, but you were concerned about the timescales. Has anything changed since the last time you were here to give you some assurance that that can be done?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I totally welcome that flexibility, but this feels like retrospective regulation. I am concerned that businesses have made decisions on the basis of existing regulations and, as those change, they might have to retrofit and spend more.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Douglas Lumsden
If someone raises a case saying that they had made a financial decision and that the rules have changed, so they will now have to spend a lot more money to operate—I do not know how much that would be; it might be nothing or it might be a lot—are you confident that, legally, that would be okay?
10:15