The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1635 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you, convener, for reminding me. I remind everyone that, at the start of the session, I was a councillor on Aberdeen City Council.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Before we move on, Paul, you mentioned that the engagement was not there at the start of the process but that it has improved. Is that now fixed or could the Government do more to improve engagement as we go through the process?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Dr Walton, I will come to you on the same question, because you mentioned that the previous strategy maybe did not have a set of SMART targets.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Ailsa, do you have anything to add? [Interruption.]
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
So, you think that we still have a good way to go with mainstreaming.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
My first question is in two parts. First, do you feel that you have been engaged in the development of the plan and has it been meaningful engagement? Secondly, do you feel that the plan takes into account the potential socioeconomic impacts of the proposed actions? I will ask Caroline Brown to go first, because she is nearest to me, and then we will probably move around the table.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Would anyone else like to add anything?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
My last question is on mainstreaming, which has been mentioned already. “The People’s Plan for Nature” calls for more mainstreaming of nature into decision making, more leadership and more Government accountability. Does the draft delivery plan provide for more mainstreaming of biodiversity, and what would successful mainstreaming look like? Do you want to pick that up, Bruce?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
I am sure that the first question always takes the longest, convener.
When we heard from the marine stakeholders, there were mixed views, including that many of the targets and actions are not SMART—specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time bound—and that the plan lacks significant new commitments in the light of the Government’s commitment to a step change. Are there significant new commitments in the plan relating to terrestrial biodiversity and does it set out SMART targets?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 12 December 2023
Douglas Lumsden
I want to drill down a bit deeper into the delivery plan. Elspeth Macdonald and Tavish Scott talked about the lack of engagement with the plan. Phil Taylor seemed to suggest that there was quite a lot of engagement, so I will go back to Tavish and Elspeth. Was there not a forum that you could contribute to? Why do you feel that there was a lack of engagement while other people feel that there was enough?