The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1635 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Okay. I will move on.
The closure of the Grangemouth refinery was a big shock, but is it correct that that does not affect the Acorn project at all?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Yes. Working with the industry will be key. In a letter to the First Minister, the chief executive of Ithaca Energy said:
“Rosebank’s £8 billion investment is ... welcome”
but that he is disappointed
“that no Scottish Minister gave any sign that the jobs likely to be supported in Scotland by this project were welcome.”
He went on to say:
“Domestic oil and gas production has fallen by 70% from its peak pre-devolution. We have explained this many times to Ministers and officials, so it is disappointing to hear the language of ‘unlimited extraction’ still used by”
the First Minister
“and other senior Ministers.”
He also said:
“Without support for oil and gas, our human capital and supply chain will be lost to the booming energy sector opportunities overseas thereby slowing down the energy transition.”
Do you accept those comments that the narrative that the Scottish Government is using about oil and gas will slow down our energy transition?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Just briefly, has analysis been done of that? Why are there fewer routes? Is it because people are using trains, for example, or are they staying in their cars or working from home? Has any analysis at all been done?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Part of the question was to ask about the fact that there is no money in the bus partnership fund for the coming financial year. Given the Government’s commitment to getting more people on to public transport, why was that part of the budget and not something else chosen to be not just cut but zeroed?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Good morning, minister. What is the Scottish Government doing to support the roll-out of bus priority measures, especially on the trunk road network, over which the Scottish ministers have direct control?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Is that £500 million commitment on-going, minister? What was the timescale for that commitment when it was made?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you, minister.
I will move on from capital to revenue for my next question. With regard to the budget for next year, the network support grant is 11 per cent less than it was for 2023-24, and the rate per kilometre travelled is not being increased either. How do you justify reducing support for the provision of bus services when, as we all agree, increased bus travel is vital for us to meet our climate change targets?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Can I just clarify whether it is the case that there was not really the demand for the bus partnership fund from local authorities, or whether projects were coming forward but the Government has just chosen not to spend that money in that area next year?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Just to clarify for my understanding, the money is being reduced for the network support grant because we have fewer buses and fewer routes. Is that a fair comment?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Douglas Lumsden
I will be brief.
During the questioning, the bus lanes in Aberdeen city were mentioned. People, sometimes, think that I am against them, but I am not—I am against the way in which they were done. When we introduce, say, bus priority measures, it should happen after full consultation with businesses and residents in the area. In Aberdeen, those regulations came forward as experimental traffic orders. To be fair, it probably meant that the Scottish Government was spending a substantial amount of money on a scheme that had not got long-term approval and that the money could therefore have been wasted.
I want to put that on the record, because it is often mentioned that I am not in favour of these things. That is not the case—I just think that it was not done in the correct way.