The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2023 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Douglas Lumsden
That would be part of the guidelines, I presume.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Douglas Lumsden
Minister, I have a question about whether the entitlement could be removed at certain times of the day. For example, let us say that a young person is using the bus to get to school. Is there an option to say that they can keep their entitlement until 6 o’clock in the evening and then are no longer allowed to use that entitlement, because they have been involved in antisocial behaviour? Was that considered? If so, was it discounted?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Douglas Lumsden
We have already heard that the Mossmorran ethylene plant is closing next month. The Grangemouth refinery is gone. David Whitehouse mentioned that there are risks to the Forties pipeline. Are we close to the tipping point at which such major pieces of infrastructure are no longer viable because there is not enough feedstock coming into them to make them worth while?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Douglas Lumsden
It must be a big concern for you and your members when you see all these closures. You must be considering what comes next and how to increase support for those communities in order to protect those jobs.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Douglas Lumsden
Others would say that oil and gas are not compatible with a climate change plan and that we should not be producing any of it if we want to get to net zero. Are they right?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Douglas Lumsden
I would like to dig into that further, but there is no time for that.
My next question is about energy from waste. Are the assumptions that are made in the plan about energy from waste credible and achievable? I am thinking of, for example, carbon capture and storage, so perhaps I will direct the question to Duncan Simpson in the first instance. When it comes to carbon capture and storage, do you think that the assumptions that are made on energy from waste will be borne out?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Douglas Lumsden
Is the technology for CCS there just now?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Douglas Lumsden
I am struggling to understand how those carbon savings can be made if biodegradable waste is still going to landfill.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Douglas Lumsden
Yes, but it will be two years before that happens.
You made the announcement before the Government released the plan. Did you have discussions with the Government before that? Was it aware that what it was putting in the plan would not be achievable, because you were not going to enforce the ban for two years?