The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1812 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Cabinet secretary, if it is such a great thing for communities, how come all the community groups that we wrote to about it are saying, “We will not take part because we are not being listened to”? It is not developers that are not listening to them; it is the Scottish Government. That is why they have real concerns. You may want to go down a path of earlier engagement and everything else, but this is what the community groups are telling us. Why are you not addressing that point? Why do they feel ignored at every opportunity by the Scottish Government?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Cabinet secretary, I want to look at the regulations for return points, the proposals for which are a bit different from what was proposed before. The regulations say that a groceries retailer can apply for an exemption from operating a return point if there is an alternative return point within reasonable proximity. Who decides whether a retailer would be allowed an exemption or not?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Would there be any appeal against that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
But there would still be an appeal process—it just needs to be ironed out. Is that right?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
But the matter will still go to the scheme administrator.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
From what I have read, hospitality is now out of scope for returns. What if I, for example, go to the pub with my pals on a Friday night, and they all have a pint of lager and I have a can of Diet Coke? Am I expected to keep my can? If it is poured for me, what happens to that can at that point?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
That is perfect. Would the same apply to, say, Murrayfield, which was campaigning to be a closed-loop premise?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Okay. Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I am not talking about the time that is taken for an objection to go in and for it to be resolved; I am talking about the time that people have in which to lodge a legal challenge being reduced from three months to six weeks. You say that that benefits everyone, but the Environmental Rights Centre for Scotland does not agree. It has raised concerns about the proposal and has even stated that clause 16 of the bill
“will have a substantial detrimental impact on access to justice”,
and that
“Civil society organisations and members of the public will struggle to meet a six-week time limit for initiating legal challenges against onshore electricity consents.”
Why is the time period being reduced from three months to six weeks?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I am sorry, cabinet secretary, but we are not talking about the two-year application time; we are talking about the time for communities to lodge an objection to onshore developments. You propose to cut that from three months to six weeks. Do you really think that communities deserve to be given that limited time to make that objection?