Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 14 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1812 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Planning and Infrastructure Bill

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

Cabinet secretary, if it is such a great thing for communities, how come all the community groups that we wrote to about it are saying, “We will not take part because we are not being listened to”? It is not developers that are not listening to them; it is the Scottish Government. That is why they have real concerns. You may want to go down a path of earlier engagement and everything else, but this is what the community groups are telling us. Why are you not addressing that point? Why do they feel ignored at every opportunity by the Scottish Government?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

Cabinet secretary, I want to look at the regulations for return points, the proposals for which are a bit different from what was proposed before. The regulations say that a groceries retailer can apply for an exemption from operating a return point if there is an alternative return point within reasonable proximity. Who decides whether a retailer would be allowed an exemption or not?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

Would there be any appeal against that?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

But there would still be an appeal process—it just needs to be ironed out. Is that right?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

But the matter will still go to the scheme administrator.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

From what I have read, hospitality is now out of scope for returns. What if I, for example, go to the pub with my pals on a Friday night, and they all have a pint of lager and I have a can of Diet Coke? Am I expected to keep my can? If it is poured for me, what happens to that can at that point?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

That is perfect. Would the same apply to, say, Murrayfield, which was campaigning to be a closed-loop premise?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

Okay. Thank you.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Planning and Infrastructure Bill

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

I am not talking about the time that is taken for an objection to go in and for it to be resolved; I am talking about the time that people have in which to lodge a legal challenge being reduced from three months to six weeks. You say that that benefits everyone, but the Environmental Rights Centre for Scotland does not agree. It has raised concerns about the proposal and has even stated that clause 16 of the bill

“will have a substantial detrimental impact on access to justice”,

and that

“Civil society organisations and members of the public will struggle to meet a six-week time limit for initiating legal challenges against onshore electricity consents.”

Why is the time period being reduced from three months to six weeks?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Planning and Infrastructure Bill

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

I am sorry, cabinet secretary, but we are not talking about the two-year application time; we are talking about the time for communities to lodge an objection to onshore developments. You propose to cut that from three months to six weeks. Do you really think that communities deserve to be given that limited time to make that objection?