The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1574 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
David Phillips of the Institute for Fiscal Studies said that
“full fiscal responsibility would likely entail substantial spending cuts or tax rises in Scotland.”
That is some expert advice. Do you agree with that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
Are there any meetings planned for this year?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
Under its terms of reference, the group is meant to meet four times a year. We are now in mid-May, and it has not met at all this year.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Michael Marra
The discussion about negotiations around public pay is useful, because it speaks to a lot of the evidence we have had from the cabinet secretary, which Craig Hoy highlighted. Public pay accounts for more than 50 per cent of the Scottish Government’s expenditure. On a strategic level—and going back to where you started, Dr Hosie, on the transparency of the budget process—the committee has found that part of the challenge is in being unable to scrutinise the overall spending of the Scottish Government in the absence of a public sector pay policy. We did not have a public sector pay policy for two years, although we have had one recently.
I am trying to pull the conversation more towards the strategic side by asking how we can improve the transparency around public sector pay in the longer term, so that we can scrutinise those bigger figures. Dave Moxham and Dr Hosie, is there more action that we could take to get the Government to be more forthright and open about the assumptions that it is working on?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Michael Marra
I think that it potentially would, convener. You are right in that a lot of considerable variables move in a UK budget and there is often a very tight timetable between the publishing of an autumn budget in the UK and the need for the Scottish Parliament to look at a budget before the end of the year. There is a very tight timescale in which to do that work. In the absence of longer-term fiscal statements or planning strategies, some of the known knowns—pay progression assumptions that might be made, the size of the public workforce over the following year, how many people will be involved and how much progressions are likely to account for—could be foregrounded more. A cabinet secretary has told the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee that the Government knew that the assumptions it was making on pay last year were unrealistic and that it was a paper exercise. That was a pretty frank admission from Gillian Martin.
Is it partly about the absence of an MTFS since 2023? Could that be a better process for helping people to understand the structure?
11:15Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Michael Marra
It is quite a strange interaction, is it not? In essence, you are modelling the policies beneath the metapolicy, but you are unable to comment on the top level, from which all the consequences flow through.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Michael Marra
Did you look at just that one scenario rather than at multiple scenarios or potential other rules? There were—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Michael Marra
We have asked, but we got a kind of blancmange of a non-answer: “We are talking about what we might do about such and such around this.”
Is it not the case that the review will get pushed back until after the next election, when we will have a variation on this conversation? I think that you are being slightly generous in saying that external factors led to the cancellation of the resource spending review. It happened because there was chaos within the Government: we lost one First Minister due to horrific performance and got another one who decided to ditch the resource spending review. This committee asked the permanent secretary about the status of the resource spending review, but he had not been told, did not know and bemoaned that fact months later. It is just a mess in policy-making terms. The issue is not just about externality; it is about putting politics first, is it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Michael Marra
But the Government’s decision not to publish clearly devalues it, too, does it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Michael Marra
Surely, the means by which we, as a country, deal with the volatile external environment involves having a stronger north star direction and looking to find variations to help us to cope with that. Do you have any ideas for how we might strengthen the long-term process?