The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1714 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
I am keen to get observations from this work on the causality and the relationship with better outcomes. It is almost about the theory of change, if I could put it that way. There is the idea of having a commissioner, as understood by the people you spoke to, and the idea that it might produce better outcomes. I am asking you to comment not on the outcomes, but on the theory of change in terms of a person being appointed and the idea that things might get better.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
Page 6 of your report mentions the “accountability gap”. What is meant by that phrase?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
I will close with a question on the process of establishing a commissioner. You were almost a participant in that, in that you provided the background research on the idea that the Government department was approaching.
I was intrigued by the quote on page 9 of your report, which says that correspondents felt that
“the campaign for a commissioner had been done to their communities, not with them.”
That is evidence that you have taken and it probably speaks to some of the concerns that the committee expressed at the outset about the policy-making process of establishing a commissioner. Is it a politician’s idea or a third sector idea, rather than something that is based in the community of people that the commissioner is meant to be serving?
10:15Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
It also jumped out at me—I think that this point is coming through from the questions that my colleagues are asking—that you observe in the report that
“There is very little published research”
in this area and
“little evaluation exploring the pros and cons of different approaches”.
At the inquiry’s outset, we are working on the basis of there being very little published work exploring this area, and that is probably where you found yourself, too. Is that correct?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
So as far as you could determine, none of the responses was based on people’s experience of other commissioners.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
Yes—I am wondering what that is. Your report mentions the need to
“bridge the gap between good intention and policy and practice on the ground”.
Is that what is meant by the “accountability gap”? I am trying to dig into the purpose of a commissioner, and I am not really sure what the point about the accountability mechanism means.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
That is fine.
Concerns have been raised that the establishment of a commissioner could be a drain on resource—in essence, it could be a substitution. Would we be better off spending the money on direct services or interventions rather than a commissioner? Did that come through in some of the evidence that you took?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Michael Marra
Is there anything else in the evidence that we have received that you will take on board when you are trying to revise the financial memorandum?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Michael Marra
So you are not given any standard ways of presenting financial memorandums. As colleagues have picked up, we are looking at wildly different ways of presenting what should be the same thing. The convener has pointed out that we cannot be in the position of comparing apples and pears. We have a little disagreement between Mr Mason and the convener about how the figures are presented and whether they are material or immaterial, but is there no standardised process that you are presented with to say how you should present the figures?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Michael Marra
So you did not adhere to the standardised process.