The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1560 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
You are talking about a move to independence and the assignation of the fiscal element, but the expert opinion is that such a shift in the constitution would have significant negative effects. You are acting to pursue full fiscal autonomy, but your Government has undertaken no analysis, despite the fact that the GERS figures are your figures—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
Good morning, cabinet secretary. You have touched on issues around the advice that you take in relation to the budget, and I wonder about the tax advisory group’s role in that regard. On what the group made of your changes to income tax, Dan Neidle, who is a member of the group, said:
“Nothing. Because they didn’t ask us. It was pure politics.”
Why would you not ask a tax advisory group, commissioned and chaired by you, for its views on your tax policy?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
I just want to follow up on some comments that colleagues have made. First of all, it strikes me that there is an issue with the design of inquiries—I will come to their method in a moment. There is often a lack of trust around the state’s role in the delivery of a service or justice, and the Government is often pushed into a position where, often under pressure, it must find a means of trying to find some solutions to that question. As a result, there is often a bit of a one-size-fits-all process.
It is not just about inquiries being judge led—we have talked about the tendency towards that approach and our perhaps becoming fixated on that aspect. Is it possible that, in different fields, entirely different approaches to dealing with some of those issues might be appropriate?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
So, you think that there is a discussion between the chair, once selected, and the Government. There must be a process where, in essence, the Government pre-designs the inquiry, because it must appoint the appropriate person; for a Covid inquiry, that person might be a senior epidemiologist, as the convener suggested, or, for a legal situation, the person might be a judge. There is some pre-construction of what will happen by the Government.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
In my head, I am trying to consider how we deal with the trust issue. People are looking for a high bar and threshold. My view is that the decline in trust in public institutions and politicians is part of the question that must be dealt with and on which people are seeking recourse.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
So, you do not know. Full fiscal autonomy is the policy today, but you do not know what its fiscal impact would be.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
David Phillips of the Institute for Fiscal Studies said that
“full fiscal responsibility would likely entail substantial spending cuts or tax rises in Scotland.”
That is some expert advice. Do you agree with that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
Are there any meetings planned for this year?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
Under its terms of reference, the group is meant to meet four times a year. We are now in mid-May, and it has not met at all this year.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Michael Marra
The discussion about negotiations around public pay is useful, because it speaks to a lot of the evidence we have had from the cabinet secretary, which Craig Hoy highlighted. Public pay accounts for more than 50 per cent of the Scottish Government’s expenditure. On a strategic level—and going back to where you started, Dr Hosie, on the transparency of the budget process—the committee has found that part of the challenge is in being unable to scrutinise the overall spending of the Scottish Government in the absence of a public sector pay policy. We did not have a public sector pay policy for two years, although we have had one recently.
I am trying to pull the conversation more towards the strategic side by asking how we can improve the transparency around public sector pay in the longer term, so that we can scrutinise those bigger figures. Dave Moxham and Dr Hosie, is there more action that we could take to get the Government to be more forthright and open about the assumptions that it is working on?