The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1960 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
You would not take any expert advice on that tax rate, then.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
Do you think that it was worth while?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
Jersey has a population of 100,000 people, and the inquiry budget was £23 million. You have already mentioned the budget restraints in social work departments, which, indeed, you have led. At the same time, social workers are protecting lives in those communities, and you were quite conscious of that, too. Would you call it a trade-off?
12:15Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
I will move on. Turning to the advice from the Scottish Fiscal Commission, I was interested to note that, on 1 April, Graeme Roy told our committee that the Scottish Fiscal Commission had not been asked to do any work at all on full fiscal autonomy, which is the stated policy of the Government. He said:
“we have had no instructions on that, so we have not looked at anything like full fiscal autonomy.”—[Official Report, Finance and Public Administration Committee, 1 April 2025; c 27.]
If that is the policy of the Government, as you set out to the Scottish Affairs Committee, would it not be best to take some professional advice as to what the implications of that might be?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
The mechanical principle is that you are pursuing this area of policy with the UK Government and you have a view of what the destination should be for the fiscal framework, but you do not have any idea of what the fiscal impact would be—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
I take that—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
I appreciate your point, convener, but exploring the issue of—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
Good morning, cabinet secretary. You have touched on issues around the advice that you take in relation to the budget, and I wonder about the tax advisory group’s role in that regard. On what the group made of your changes to income tax, Dan Neidle, who is a member of the group, said:
“Nothing. Because they didn’t ask us. It was pure politics.”
Why would you not ask a tax advisory group, commissioned and chaired by you, for its views on your tax policy?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
I just want to follow up on some comments that colleagues have made. First of all, it strikes me that there is an issue with the design of inquiries—I will come to their method in a moment. There is often a lack of trust around the state’s role in the delivery of a service or justice, and the Government is often pushed into a position where, often under pressure, it must find a means of trying to find some solutions to that question. As a result, there is often a bit of a one-size-fits-all process.
It is not just about inquiries being judge led—we have talked about the tendency towards that approach and our perhaps becoming fixated on that aspect. Is it possible that, in different fields, entirely different approaches to dealing with some of those issues might be appropriate?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
So, you think that there is a discussion between the chair, once selected, and the Government. There must be a process where, in essence, the Government pre-designs the inquiry, because it must appoint the appropriate person; for a Covid inquiry, that person might be a senior epidemiologist, as the convener suggested, or, for a legal situation, the person might be a judge. There is some pre-construction of what will happen by the Government.