The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1960 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
Okay. My final question for you, Dr Ireton, is on the tension between the freedom that an inquiry has and public trust. The issue with an inquiry that has a more limited remit, particularly within your taxonomy, is how it relates to the views of victims, related parties and the public more generally. Are there other things that could be done to build public trust in a more limited form of inquiry?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
So, this bill does not do it.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
But you cannot tell us how much big parts of the bill will cost.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
I am glad that your confidence has increased.
09:30Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
Okay. I have my doubts.
Let us go back to the first point, about the accountability side, and also to your point that you still do not know what the costs will be across different parts of the bill, including from any amendments that might be made to the bill at stage 3. You said that new sections 37A to 37E, on information standards,
“do not significantly alter what was said in relation to costs”
in the original financial memorandum and that
“Costs do not arise from the primary legislation, they will arise from the information standards created under it.”
Going back to the point about co-design, there are significant areas of the bill that just cannot be costed—is that correct?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
Really?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
Given the evidence that we heard in the previous session, I wonder whether the three of you might agree that it is not really appropriate for a very eminent member of your profession, appointed to this position, to spend a large amount of time looking for an office and internet connections. Is that a waste of public money?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
We have been hearing about the adversarial nature of some of these inquiries, where there is an eminent KC standing in front of what is, in essence, a courtroom and asking for evidence from an individual and putting them on the stand about decisions that might have been made and where those might have flowed from. It is about whether that is the right model. If we have people like you who are employed—rightly, within this model; I do not deny that—to protect the interests and liabilities of a set of people as they may pertain to future legal action, as well as the inquiry that they are in, does that not run against some of your first premise, of assisting the inquiry?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
My definition or interpretation of “adversarial” is probably not the strict legal interpretation. “Aggressive” might be another way to describe it. I will rest on that.
The last area that I will ask about is the application of artificial intelligence in these kinds of inquiries. We have heard so far in evidence about the huge amounts of documentation that are involved. Have you seen AI triaging of large document sets in public inquiries?
13:00Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
I tend to agree with that. Have you seen any other examples of the use of AI in public inquiries?