The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1941 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Marra
Ministers are making the decisions about when to hold up the mirror—when to bow to the pressure. Other members have set out examples of public pressure in cases where they feel that the Government or institutions in Scottish society more broadly have not given them the answers that they require. How do you account for the recent uptick in the number of inquiries? Other members have spoken about whether that is about the Government, but, if it is not about the Government’s actions—you said that you do not believe that it is—why is it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Marra
Okay. That is a reasonable argument.
To take the point about issues being kicked into the long grass a step further, you said that you do not think that it would be appropriate to get into the details of the Eljamel inquiry, but you are not the sponsor of that inquiry. Is there not a risk that these inquiries shut down the Government’s ability to deal with some of the substantive issues? On the conduct of the Government, the First Minister said on the record recently that he cannot comment on civil court cases, which is simply untrue—it is completely untrue. There must be a sense that the Government has candour and the ability to talk about issues that are of interest to the public, rather than putting them into a semi-private domain.
10:30Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Marra
I am interested in the issue of sponsorship—where a minister is a sponsor of a particular inquiry. As a committee, we might reflect on how useful that is. Would it be better if Parliament, rather than ministers, sponsored an inquiry and had a central committee that took decisions about monitoring its activity?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Marra
My point is that we are five years on from what happened, and it might happen again next month. It is about how quickly we can get the answers and learn the lessons that are required.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Marra
Do you think that there is a case for having a central office with centralised experience and standard operating procedures to provide the secretariat and back-room capability for each inquiry, in order to bear down on costs?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Marra
Can I ask one last brief question, convener?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Marra
Thank you, convener—I appreciate it.
When you are engaging in these considerations, there may well be a lot of media coverage, as there was around the Sheku Bayoh inquiry. That inquiry was about something that happened in Kirkcaldy on one afternoon, and affected around 20 people directly—it is, of course, incredibly serious and worthy of investigation. The Covid inquiry was huge in scope and affected the entire country. However, there is a one-size-fits-all approach to inquiries.
Will the problems in the Sheku Bayoh inquiry be a point of reflection that the Cabinet will discuss after the inquiry concludes, in order to be able to say why the system is or is not working? In that inquiry, the system clearly has not worked; we can talk about all the different ways in which it has collapsed and the problems that it has had, setting aside the case for the inquiry itself. Will the Government discuss that and try to reflect on it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Marra
For the record, I begin by echoing Liz Smith’s comments due to my involvement in the Eljamel inquiry. In a similar way, I have presented my own evidence to the inquiry.
Given your statements today, Deputy First Minister, is the cost of £258.8 million too high?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Marra
However, in the end, these are Government decisions. As much as we can talk about it, and you are right to highlight the very legitimate concerns of people externally making the case, in the end, it is the Government that decides to have an inquiry and not to use the alternative processes. Therefore, the issue is really not about ignorance on the part of the public; it is a decision that has been taken by the Government, and it appoints the person who leads the inquiry. These are Government decisions, are they not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Marra
On your point about pace, we are five years on from the Covid inquiry, and two interim modules have been produced. You cannot really be satisfied with the pace of response if we are trying to learn lessons about a global pandemic, given that we might have another one in a month’s time.
The convener mentioned Covid inquiries elsewhere. The Covid inquiry in Australia was completed within two years, with a full set of recommendations. A pandemic could happen again, and we have already heard that 23,000 lives were lost during the Covid pandemic as a result of the suboptimal—to say the least—response from the Government. Surely the inquiry should happen an awful lot quicker so that we can learn lessons quickly. The system that we are using is not meeting the public need.