The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1560 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
I suppose that that is part of the issue with Dr Ireton’s position. I understand the tensions that arise in relation to the freedom that inquiries have, and in your evidence this morning, you have been a stout defender of the need for judges to be led by the evidence as it is presented—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
In your written evidence, you identified that you were restricted partly by your inability to command evidence, particularly from commercial firms, which would not provide you with such evidence. Would it have been better if the inquiry had had full statutory powers from the outset?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
Dr Ireton, you set out what one might call your inquiry taxonomy, when you talked about forensic, policy and truth-telling inquiries. Have you looked at the issues of commercial interests and what happens when a firm, or a set of organisations, refuses to give full evidence due to commercial interests and the need to protect their firm or organisation? Are statutory powers required for that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
Okay. My final question for you, Dr Ireton, is on the tension between the freedom that an inquiry has and public trust. The issue with an inquiry that has a more limited remit, particularly within your taxonomy, is how it relates to the views of victims, related parties and the public more generally. Are there other things that could be done to build public trust in a more limited form of inquiry?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
Okay.
As of January 2024, there were 170 civil servants working on the bill at a monthly cost to the taxpayer of approximately £1 million. Is that still the case?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
I will leave my questions there. However, as a genuine point, minister, although I consider myself to be pretty well versed in financial memorandums—I have higher-level degrees in economics and other areas of finance—there are big parts of this financial memorandum that I find difficult to understand, because we are not comparing the same things. We are not comparing apples with apples; there are different timescales and approaches. Would it not be better to start again with a proper bill and a proper costing, so that we could understand what it is meant to do?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
Mr Pugh, how would you describe your role in relation to acting on behalf of health boards in the Covid inquiry? What are you attempting to achieve for your clients?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
When you talk about the fairness of the procedure, is that about the liabilities of a health board for decisions that it might have taken and wanting to keep it aware of how the issues and evidence that are raised might pertain to future legal action?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
I would have thought that a lot of the public who were viewing the Covid inquiry would have found it to feel quite adversarial, with Jamie Dawson KC standing there and asking very pointed questions of a variety of different people. I am not denying the part about getting to the truth, but if you have lots of interested parties who are fighting for their own protection, does it really help us to get to the truth?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
Other packages are available. Thank you.