The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1714 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
Given the evidence that we heard in the previous session, I wonder whether the three of you might agree that it is not really appropriate for a very eminent member of your profession, appointed to this position, to spend a large amount of time looking for an office and internet connections. Is that a waste of public money?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
We have been hearing about the adversarial nature of some of these inquiries, where there is an eminent KC standing in front of what is, in essence, a courtroom and asking for evidence from an individual and putting them on the stand about decisions that might have been made and where those might have flowed from. It is about whether that is the right model. If we have people like you who are employed—rightly, within this model; I do not deny that—to protect the interests and liabilities of a set of people as they may pertain to future legal action, as well as the inquiry that they are in, does that not run against some of your first premise, of assisting the inquiry?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
My definition or interpretation of “adversarial” is probably not the strict legal interpretation. “Aggressive” might be another way to describe it. I will rest on that.
The last area that I will ask about is the application of artificial intelligence in these kinds of inquiries. We have heard so far in evidence about the huge amounts of documentation that are involved. Have you seen AI triaging of large document sets in public inquiries?
13:00Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
I tend to agree with that. Have you seen any other examples of the use of AI in public inquiries?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
Have you seen any of those systems being used for redaction? Lawyers might have to do large-scale redaction across many thousands of documents, and we have heard in evidence that there are significant resource implications of AI being used to identify names and particulars and to carry out redaction on a mass basis. Have you seen that, Mr Clancy?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
Indeed.
Like Liz Smith, I must declare an interest because of my involvement with the Eljamel inquiry. I have constituents who are involved in that, and I have had conversations with ministers about the setting up of the inquiry. Some of the delays in that respect are to do with finding a chair—that is, waiting for the Lord President to find somebody of standing, such as you, to take the inquiry on. Is there not a risk that nine-year inquiries result in more people saying, “I would love to do this, but no thanks. I’d also like to spend the time with my grandchildren”?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
For clarification, minister, is it correct that the bill no longer establishes a national care service?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
That is useful. There is already some language in terms of civil servants, names of departments and so on. I understand that changing those might not be a priority, but, for clarity and for the public, I note that you started out by saying that you want there to be transparency as to those who are accountable. It is important to recognise that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
Okay. That is useful.
In your opening remarks to the convener, you said that the state of the financial projections is a function of the bill being at stage 2 rather than at stage 3. You have to recognise that we cannot evaluate a financial memorandum on that basis. Financial memorandums are presented at the start of the scrutiny of a bill, with projections. We look at them and consider whether they are realistic, and we ask the kind of questions that the convener has been asking. We cannot just have a blank cheque, waiting for what might happen at stages 2 and 3. That is not a reasonable position, is it?