The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1714 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Michael Marra
So, the Government does not supply you with any of its working on evaluating whether it should adopt a certain policy approach. I understand your point about motivation, but that is not really what my question is about. We can agree about the motivation behind a policy but move on to decide the most effective approach. From what Mr Davidson described, deep complexity surrounds the behavioural effects, the thresholds, the timing of when people exit, and how all those factors are combined. However, you say that you were not provided with any working on the assumptions that the Government had made in choosing its approach.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Michael Marra
With regard to your evaluating the fiscal impacts of the approach, you will understand that one of the committee’s interests concerns the effectiveness of the approach that is chosen. That side of it is interesting.
Let us move on to the economic performance gap. In 2022-23, it was £624 million; in December 2024, it was £838 million; and, in May 2025, it was £1.06 billion, so it is clear that it has been increasing significantly over the past two years.
In addition, to pick up on what colleagues said about the negative income tax reconciliation, that has grown by 20 per cent in the past six months. I understand some of the factors that are involved in that. Are you concerned about the fact that, as a result of all those different factors, the Scottish Government appears to have a growing gap across those different areas?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Michael Marra
If we get ourselves into a position in which we undertake a spending review after the election in 2026, we will, as you said, be approaching the midpoint of the UK Government’s spending review cycle. There has been a lot of discussion about the problems with an MTFS, because events come along and things change. In your view, should the Government simply get ahead and get it done? Would that be the best thing to do to address the strategic challenges that you have set out in your report?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Michael Marra
For my last question, I want to go back to the issue of productivity. You mentioned that capital investment is comparatively lower in Scotland. I attended an excellent conference on Friday, at which I chaired a session, but there was one thing that I found slightly puzzling, so I will ask the question that I did not get answered then. It relates to the availability of capital to firms in Scotland.
Prior to the Ukraine crisis, companies and firms would tell me that the availability of capital was not the problem, because capital was relatively cheap for a long period of time. Because of low interest rates, it was accessible. Interest rates have now increased and it is a bit more difficult for firms to access capital. However, access to capital is a long-term problem; it is not just a short-term problem, following the invasion of Ukraine. In a marketplace in which capital was cheap, Scottish firms were still underinvesting in capital and productivity. Can you say why that is a problem?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Michael Marra
I will start by putting on the record my involvement with the Eljamel inquiry, which involves representing constituents.
Mary Morgan, I have a brief question that relates to the issue that my colleague John Mason raised regarding the £9 million of legal services provided to NHS Scotland boards. Do you bill those boards for the services that you provide?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Michael Marra
Last week, we heard evidence from a member of the Faculty of Advocates who said that he is representing a group of NHS boards in a couple of on-going public inquiries, including the Covid inquiry. The £9 million figure does not represent the entirety of the budgetary impact for the NHS boards that are involved in inquiries. They draw certain services from you, but they engage other services externally as well. Is that correct?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Michael Marra
What services does it provide?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Michael Marra
That is very useful. Do you have any understanding of the global figure for the impact of legal costs across all the territorial boards?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Michael Marra
That is fine. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michael Marra
As do lawyers.