The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1960 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Marra
Indeed. We are talking about the trend. My question is, do you think that, at the moment, there is space in the marketplace for additional taxes?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Michael Marra
There is £1.4 billion of additional money available to the Government, and £1.1 billion available to portfolios, but it seems that it is being allocated to the increasing cost of delivering the same model of public services across Scotland. That is my reading of it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Michael Marra
Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Michael Marra
But not to ministers. I think everyone here was quite surprised by your answer, Professor Seaton, when you were asked when you had last had a conversation with a Government minister. You said that it was with Jenny Gilruth in August and that you have never spoken to the current Minister for Further and Higher Education. Given the rhetoric that we have heard from the Government, I had assumed that, on day 1 in his post, Mr Macpherson would have said that one of the five top things on his to-do list would be to have a conversation with Nigel Seaton.
You have described this as being one of the biggest crises in a British university since the second world war. Let me give you a quote. On 3 April, in the Parliament chamber, John Swinney said to me:
“I assure Mr Marra that there is no absence of leadership on that question, which is commanding a huge amount of the Government’s time, attention and focus”.—[Official Report, 3 April 2025; c 25.]
However, you have not had a conversation with the higher education minister, who has now been in post for two months. That is extraordinary, is it not? Have you tried to have a conversation with him?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Michael Marra
Is that the £12 million, initially? Will you give us the quantum for that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Michael Marra
Okay, that is useful to know.
You will have seen reports of turmoil in the Scottish Funding Council. There have been board meetings where there has been uproar about what is happening at Dundee and particularly about how exposed the Scottish Funding Council is. I have two questions on that. First, given what you have described, is the SFC autonomous from the Government?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Michael Marra
Is the Scottish Funding Council competent to deal with this issue, particularly given the fire that is running through the sector?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Michael Marra
Secondly, you mentioned earlier that the proposal was put forward by yourself, but there did not appear to be any analysis of that—there was just a letter that came back in response. Do you think that the Funding Council scrutinised the proposal, or was that a political response?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Michael Marra
I will close with this point, convener. In the conversations that I have with staff, they tell me that, from day to day, many things are not working in the institution. As people will understand, when you take out the number of staff that the university has done, both through the voluntary severance scheme and through people resigning from key posts, grants do not get signed off and approval cannot be got for posts or expenditure in different areas.
You have talked a little bit about this already, Professor Seaton. Given that level of change, is there any way in which people can be heard? When people tell me about not being able to get those critical decisions pushed through in an institution—and, as some have told me, this is about the wages that they get in their bank accounts and about grants that are not being signed off but which are sitting on executive-level desks instead—is there any way in which I can raise that directly? Given the turmoil, is there any means that you can create internally—or any problem-solving, star-chamber approach that you can take—to ensure that those things get sorted in order to make the organisation work?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Michael Marra
Thank you both for coming today. I will start with the issue of prioritising buildings instead of people. One of the key things that staff tell me is how they feel when they hear that a surplus has to be generated in order to make buildings nicer while they are potentially losing their livelihoods, which will cause the city to lose wages and the economy to suffer. Do you understand how that feels, Professor Seaton?