The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1960 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
So as far as you could determine, none of the responses was based on people’s experience of other commissioners.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
Yes—I am wondering what that is. Your report mentions the need to
“bridge the gap between good intention and policy and practice on the ground”.
Is that what is meant by the “accountability gap”? I am trying to dig into the purpose of a commissioner, and I am not really sure what the point about the accountability mechanism means.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
That is fine.
Concerns have been raised that the establishment of a commissioner could be a drain on resource—in essence, it could be a substitution. Would we be better off spending the money on direct services or interventions rather than a commissioner? Did that come through in some of the evidence that you took?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Michael Marra
Is there anything else in the evidence that we have received that you will take on board when you are trying to revise the financial memorandum?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Michael Marra
So you are not given any standard ways of presenting financial memorandums. As colleagues have picked up, we are looking at wildly different ways of presenting what should be the same thing. The convener has pointed out that we cannot be in the position of comparing apples and pears. We have a little disagreement between Mr Mason and the convener about how the figures are presented and whether they are material or immaterial, but is there no standardised process that you are presented with to say how you should present the figures?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Michael Marra
So you did not adhere to the standardised process.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Michael Marra
So, there is a cost to acceleration. That is very useful.
As a broader question, how does this work map on to the SFC’s other work? The commission has set out the long-term fiscal scenarios for Scotland, but Professor Roy said that he has learned a lot from this process, too. Can we expect very substantial updates with regard to the longer-term challenges in the next iteration of your 2050 vision?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Michael Marra
I thank the witnesses for the really useful discussion so far. Given all that you have said and the content of the report, do you still believe that the 2030 target is credible?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Michael Marra
You say in the report that meeting the 2030 target
“would require technologies and other changes to be more advanced than set out in any of the CCC’s pathway scenarios to reach net zero”.
Just for clarity, are you saying that those technologies are not sufficiently advanced and that it is going to cost more money to do things with existing technologies?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Michael Marra
Just in closing, I would say that your observations on interoperability and the reliance on a collaborative approach between the UK and Scottish Governments, not least with regard to the fiscal trajectory that the country has to follow to meet these challenges, are absolutely right, but do you feel that institutions outside the fiscal framework are reflecting the same concerns? Do you think that ministers and senior civil servants are having these discussions about the scale of the challenge and how, between the devolved institutions and Whitehall, it might be met?