The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1941 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Marra
I will close by returning to the issue of public spending, which of course you comment on quite regularly. I am thinking about two of your reports: one entitled, “NHS in Scotland 2025: Finance and performance”, and another, published more recently, in November, which is entitled, “The 2024/25 audit of NHS Tayside”. The picture that both reports paint is of a Government that is unable to change services. There does not seem to be a process whereby it can deliver change and efficiency on the public spending side. If you are looking at a tripod of issues around tax and growth, but the Government is focused on the third leg—spending decisions—and it is not able to deliver on those, is it not a key issue of concern if that is its principal focus and you, as Auditor General, keep telling the Parliament that it is not able to deliver change and manage public spending effectively?
10:45Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Marra
Returning to the mental health services side, I want to use that as an illustration of the Government’s inability to meet those broader targets. We have had report after report, including from yourselves, on such services, and the Government just seems to be unable to actually deliver change. What is the dysfunction that is resulting in that, when you tell us that that is the one factor that the Government identifies that it can use to control its massive budget black hole?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Marra
So, you do not see that directly in the documents; you are describing what might be called an absence. Have you any sense, from the Government’s other work, that it understands that this is a problem, or do you feel that it is pushing the problem away for political convenience?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Marra
I will maybe come back to the spending side of it. You also mentioned that such decisions would be supported by
“a more detailed assessment of the potential impact and timescales”
on taxation. Could you tell us a little more about what you mean by that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Marra
Auditor General, your report says:
“The Scottish Government, through its fiscal publications, has not done enough to explain why the potential funds raised from tax policy are so notably different from the net contribution to the Scottish Budget, and how it intends to address this.”
Why do you think that is?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Marra
I suppose a fairly typical criticism of Governments in general, and their approach to taxation in particular, is that they are often more interested in the harvest rather than in growth in the first place. They use tax to plug the gap in their spending plans rather than thinking about how it might support the sustainability of the sector.
Liz Smith touched on issues about opportunity in certain areas and on thinking about the future. From the Government’s documentation, and the work that it has carried out, have you a sense that it is sensitive to the impact that its own tax measures might have on the performance of sectors in Scotland that might be weaker?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Marra
A lot of your work is on the broad sustainability of not just public services but public finances. Your report identifies that there is a strategic balance to be struck between decisions on tax growth and those on spending, to make sure that we have the best outcomes.
I will address the first point, on the tax side. You highlight that a 1 percentage point increase in the top rate would result in only £5 million of benefit, but also that the Government has decided not to make any changes to bands within that area. Has the Government boxed itself into a policy position there? Has it given sufficient justification for the trade-offs around that position?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Michael Marra
In your answers to the convener, you said that you did not want to make any promises that you cannot keep. However, 1 April was the statutory deadline that you were set, and you pushed that back to 31 October. In July, you said that you would keep that statutory deadline but that some work would continue until 31 December. On 1 October, you said that some parts of that will be finished in 2026 and others in 2027. You have been making promises that you cannot keep for a long time, have you not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Michael Marra
In the gap between 1 April and July, you went from saying, essentially, that it could be completed by October to saying, “Actually, this is going to run on significantly longer than that”. What kind of conversations were you having with your colleagues when you made one statement and then, a few weeks later, you had to completely change that timeframe?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Michael Marra
That makes it incredibly difficult for somebody to plan for their retirement. They will be thinking, “Do I have enough money to have the life that I want for myself and my family?” They have to have made the decision and they have a six-month timeline before you tell them how much of their own money they are getting back. Is that the case?