The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 714 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
With the cost of doing business in Scotland being quite high—due to business rates, VAT, which you mentioned, regulations on short-term lets and many other issues—is this extra cost on businesses justified?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
In 2018, the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities called for a tax on visitors and not on businesses. It seems as if the bill will have a substantial impact on businesses—in particular, the small business and microbusinesses that you have spoken about today. What is your view on whether it will be a tax on visitors and not on businesses?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Good morning. You have mentioned higher taxes and VAT. Given the high costs of doing business in Scotland, business rates, regulations on short-term lets and many other issues, do you think that the extra cost on business is justified?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
There will be a lot of burdens on small businesses and microbusinesses, as you say. In looking for a solution and turning that around, how can we ensure that there are not major administrative burdens on small businesses and microbusinesses? How can they be helped and things moved forward?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
In 2018, COSLA called for a tax on visitors but not businesses, but it seems as though the levy will have a substantial impact on businesses, particularly microbusinesses and small businesses. What are your views on whether it is a tax on visitors and not on businesses? What is the solution so that there is less administrative burden, which you spoke about earlier, on businesses?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you for clarifying that. Does the minister want to say something?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Planning, because—.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Good morning. As you probably know, today is the first day of industrial action by non-teaching staff. Last week, we heard that the Verity house agreement has had little impact on Unison’s discourse with COSLA. Johanna Baxter, who is the head of local government at Unison, suggested that it might be used as a reason why one side cannot take on the other. For example, COSLA cannot criticise the Scottish Government by asking why it will not provide more money to fund pay deals. Similarly, the Scottish Government refuses to interfere in COSLA’s relationship with the trade unions. Where are the lines of accountability drawn here? How can you guarantee that there will be constructive conversations about financial resources? I put that question to Councillor Hagmann, in the first instance.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Councillor Hagmann, you are absolutely right to show where the accountability lies. However, although there is a pay offer on the table, I heard—I hope that I heard right this morning—that the trade unions want certainty about where the funding for that pay offer is going to come from and confirmation that it is not going to come from more cuts. Local government is really suffering. You are right to say that those workers are the people who are delivering on the ground. If the money is going to come from cuts, it will be a case of robbing Peter to pay Paul. That is why they want to know where the funds are going to come from.
Therefore, I think that the Scottish Government is accountable here, because the issue comes down to the funding settlements and where the Scottish Government can help. As you said, the Scottish Government cannot step in directly, but the process starts with the Government, so it can help out. That is why clarity is needed about where the cuts will be, if there are to be cuts. What is your view on that?