The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 760 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I want to ask you something that I asked the previous witnesses—I do not know whether you heard the question at the end of the earlier session. You spoke about poverty at different times in women’s lives. What about the cultural aspect and ethnic minority groups? How are they affected? Is there anything that you want to say about work in that area that needs to be enhanced? We heard that the poverty rate is around 51 per cent for ethnic minority groups. Is there any work that we should strengthen in that area? Do you have any advice for us?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Has Sara Cowan had that opportunity, too?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Good morning. I thank the witnesses for all the evidence that they have provided so far. My question leads on from the previous questions. Have the witnesses been given the opportunity to work with the Scottish Government on the improvements that the committee heard would strengthen the equality and fairer Scotland statement?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I have another question. I think that you have answered some of it, but you might want to add to it. Gender inequality is an issue that I take very seriously. Engender and Zero Tolerance have both expressed a need for a specific gender inequality outcome as part of the Scottish Government’s national outcomes. Can witnesses expand on where the current proposals fall short of supporting gender equality? I know that you have touched on some of that in previous answers but is there anything that you would like to add about where the outcomes fall short?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I do not know whether Dr Hosie wants to say anything.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I have a supplementary question. The Scottish Women’s Budget Group has suggested that a gender budgeting approach should consider the lifetime impact of policy and spending decisions. To what extent does current data availability support that aspiration?
12:00Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Good morning, and thank you for the information so far. Zero Tolerance and Engender have both suggested slight changes to the wording of the Scottish Government’s proposed new national outcomes. Zero Tolerance has suggested changing the equality and human rights outcome so that it includes “living free from violence”. Engender has suggested incorporating the current national performance framework’s aim of reducing inequalities into the new NPF’s purpose. Will you please expand on those proposals? Are any other witnesses in agreement with those suggestions? I will speak to Lewis Ryder-Jones afterwards, but it would be great if I could get views from both Catherines first.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I want to probe you on your response about recording gender when people are made homeless. Catherine Murphy talked about how people in minority groups would behave. I have done quite a lot of work in that area. I know that a female probably would behave differently if she was homeless. I totally understand that they may go to relatives or friends and might not sleep on the streets. However, people from an ethnic minority might behave completely differently because of cultural aspects. Could any of the three witnesses shed some light on that? Should more data be collected on that, or should we even just have alignment of data sets?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Good morning. Your submission states that the use of ring fencing puts further pressure on councils, which are
“legally required to set a balanced budget”.
Are councillors confident that we will see further reductions in ring fencing this year? Also, does COSLA believe that there are any good reasons for ring fencing of funding? Katie Hagmann said that good engagement is going on right now between the Scottish Government and local government, so it would be good to hear from you about whether there are good reasons for ring fencing, as well.