The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 969 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Yes, the monitoring and the register would do that. Earlier, we spoke about the deterrent effect. I think that the register would provide a deterrent. Obviously, I will not go over—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Yes. When you talk about risk, I know that risk has been mentioned a lot, and I absolutely agree that there would have to be a risk assessment in place somewhere. Currently, some risk assessments are already done for sex offenders, so I would not take out that requirement. I do not know the full position.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Absolutely, convener. It is important that, in light of the evidence-taking sessions that the committee has had, it is open to us to consider where the bill can be amended. That is why bills go through stages 1, 2 and 3 in the Parliament.
I know that there are processes in place—we are all aware of the sex offenders register, for example—but I am merely seeking to complement the system that is already in place and to work with MAPPA. Ninety-five per cent of sex offenders might be on that register at the moment but, from the data, it is not very clear how many of those offenders are also domestic abusers.
I think that my system—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I know from my meetings with women’s aid organisations and other organisations that a lot of good work is being done, including in my area of East Dunbartonshire, in addition to the equally safe at school programme, which goes into schools. Many organisations are working in this area. They have highlighted a number of programmes to do with domestic abuse. There are a lot of them, but I cannot name them all.
In our initial consultation, there was a lot of support for the provisions on domestic abuse education—94 per cent of respondents supported the bill’s proposals to make the provision of domestic abuse education statutory. That is a higher level of support than other parts of the bill received, although they, too, received high levels of support, such as 89 per cent and 92 per cent. I just wanted to highlight that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I mentioned earlier that my register would complement and work with MAPPA, which already operates in those three areas. I want domestic abuse to be added to the offences included in MAPPA on a stand-alone basis, rather than for cases to come through only if that gets flagged up.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
MAPPA, as a multi-agency response, must consider who the offenders are. At the end of the day, the register would not work outside any of the organisations or arrangements that I mentioned, including those that are involved in MAPPA.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Absolutely—as a member of the committee, you are well entitled to put that out there, but I think that it is a bit unfair to me to mention that I said that we should give it a chance without acknowledging the context of all the information that I have provided in the past 50 minutes or more.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I said them in the context of all the information and evidence that I have provided in this discussion. I did not just say suddenly say those words alone, with nothing else.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
No. I believe that the proposed statute is very important, because we currently have a postcode lottery. Certain local authorities have services available. There are other programmes, too. It is not for me to say what rehabilitation programmes should look like, or whether they would come under the Caledonian system or not. However, it is for me to ensure that an assessment would be in place, from court to prison to parole, and it is very important to put that in statute. That has not been done or rolled out so far, and the process is painfully slow.
Governments will change and certain things will happen. Funding will move around. It is so important to have opportunities for rehabilitation in place at every stage.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I have. I spoke to the Government at one of my meetings with it, and I was told that it was looking at the issue. As we sit here, nearly a year on, I have not heard anything more. All that I keep hearing is, “We are looking at it.” It is very important that we put it in statute and that we do not wait for the Government to change, for other things to change or maybe for promises to be broken. People need the information now.