The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1055 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
The point that the duty is anticipatory, rather than reactive to a request, is a good one. It is perhaps about the sector being more prepared. There are services that are offered in the public sector that should have such materials available as par for the course—for example, the Electoral Commission did good work on access to voting, because we know that that happens on a cycle. Is it your view that public bodies should, as a first step, consider where the very common interactions are, and then consider the more reactive stuff when it concerns a relationship with the person using the service?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
Okay. I heard your offer to come back to the committee on the detail of that, which I think would be useful to colleagues, and then we can perhaps review the implementation.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
Good morning. As we have discussed throughout our inquiry, the Scottish Government has revised its approach to inclusive communication. Instead of there being a specific duty, the intention is to use ministerial powers to draw attention to guidance and materials on inclusive communication.
John, you raised the concern that, given that the Equality Act 2010 already provides for reasonable adjustments, the Scottish Government’s proposal could be viewed as unclear. Could you maybe explain the EHRC’s position on that proposal?
10:30Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
Part of the challenge is that, although we heard from public bodies and local authorities that they are aware of the duty and want to ensure that they are fulfilling it, we also heard from disabled people’s organisations in particular that inclusive communication is just not happening as standard. A resourcing issue was mentioned, too. Would you want to see all that brought together and acknowledged so that we have a more robust system?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
Good morning. Throughout our evidence sessions, I have asked about inclusive communication. The Scottish Government has revised its approach such that, instead of having a specific duty on inclusive communication, it will use a ministerial power to draw attention to guidance and materials on inclusive communication. It would be useful to understand why that change was made to the initial proposal on inclusive communication. What do you think that the new proposal will achieve?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
Louise Coupland, do you recognise the synergies in relation to what you said about having access to a human being to talk to and get information and support from?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
That is very helpful.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
I think that colleagues around the table recognise the challenge of bank branches on the high street disappearing. The Bank of Scotland branch will be the last bank branch to leave Barrhead, in the region that I represent, and the neighbouring community in Neilston has lost its post office service. There is a perfect storm of reductions in post office services and high street bank branches.
I will make two points. First, the Link Scheme assessment that is done on whether a bank branch should remain in a community often does not take account of the views and experiences of the elderly population. Secondly, as the deputy convener was keen to talk about practical solutions that we can advocate, it would be good to get your reflections on the banking hub model that has been developed in some communities. How does that work? Should we push the UK Government to support us to do more of that?
I will come to Kyle Scott first, because he touched on that in his previous answer.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
Good morning. I am particularly interested in how we report and record in situations where ethnicity and disability cross over. I have had the opportunity to ask questions, particularly on the recording of data belonging to people who are applying for social security and on understanding their rights.
I appreciate that there is a proposal to extend gender pay gap reporting to look more specifically at ethnicity and disability. I know that CEMVO said that there are risks associated with reporting on that—in particular because low numbers could impact on the results. We have seen that issue in social security more broadly, which I have referred to. Could witnesses make some general comments on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Paul O'Kane
That was helpful. Thanks.