The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1200 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
I am sorry: I appreciate that I am asking very wide-ranging questions.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
I am grateful for those contributions. It is helpful for the committee to have that on the public record as well as in your written statements. In relation to how the bill might change, it is useful to understand your view that the bill would have to be substantially rewritten in order to achieve some of what has been set out by other witnesses from whom we have heard.
I appreciate that the Association of Construction Attorneys takes a different view. How was that view arrived at, and what is your view of the discussion that we have just had?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
It would be worth exploring the comparison with England, notwithstanding the point that was just made about the scope of the bill. If we are having an academic discussion, let us have the academic discussion.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
It is useful to have that view. Does anyone wish to add to that point before I ask another question?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
Good morning. I will begin with issues relating to proposed regulation. Mr Dunlop commented on what the bill is not seeking to do, in relation to independent regulation, in the view of the majority of the panel, and I am keen to understand those views more.
In evidence sessions in previous weeks, we have heard support for independent regulation to some degree, although you contend that that is not within the scope of the bill. Might you be able to expand slightly on the argument for why you feel that it is not within the scope of the bill, and that—to use the expression that you used—that ship has sailed. I am keen to understand the thinking around that.
10:00Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
Yes, if I can.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
I refer to your written submission, Mr Murdoch. It is concerning for the committee to hear your view on the threat to the independence of the judiciary. Could you expand on your view of the bill, perhaps by addressing the point about amendments to the bill and what might be required to deal with some of the problems?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
Good morning to the panel. I would like to understand the witnesses’ views on the proposed membership of SEIAC. We have had a lot of submissions about who should be in and who should not be in. The bill sets out the balance between employees and employers and the types of expertise. In your view, is it the right mix or are there things missing from the proposal in the bill?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
Lucy Kenyon, your submission mentioned the need to broaden the scope of the membership. Do you want to comment on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
I think that you are making an argument for that formal role within the SEIAC membership, but I wonder whether, more broadly, there is an opportunity to widen the scope via people or organisations having observer status and being able to share views, opinions and expertise. Although I take the point that you make about having a formal status, do you agree that there is opportunity beyond that?