Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 6 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1072 contributions

|

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Aarhus Convention

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Paul O’Kane

Would you be keen to at least see some work started on that? I am sure that people have already started to discuss some views and ideas about what could change, particularly with environmental stakeholders. I assume that there is a wealth of experience and work that is ready to be put forward.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Aarhus Convention

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Paul O’Kane

Good morning. In the previous evidence session, there was discussion about the possibility of dedicated environmental courts. We heard about some international evidence from New South Wales in particular, and the operation of its environmental court. Can the minister expand on why the Scottish Government thinks that a dedicated environmental court is not necessary in Scotland?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Aarhus Convention

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Paul O’Kane

I appreciate that, but it would be useful to the committee if the relevant minister could give an indication of what the plan is for that.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Aarhus Convention

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Paul O’Kane

I have heard what the minister has said regarding the Government’s view of the international examples that have been listed, and I also heard what the minister said in her previous answer regarding the reform of legal aid. Does the minister think that there is further scope to continue to monitor and discuss those issues? In the previous evidence session, scepticism was expressed about what can be achieved on legal aid reform in this session of Parliament. Could the minister touch on those wider on-going reviews?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 November 2024

Paul O’Kane

No, except to say that that would be helpful to the committee, if it were possible.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 November 2024

Paul O’Kane (West Scotland) (Lab)

Good morning. In your opening remarks, cabinet secretary, you mentioned the alkaline hydrolysis procedure and the payment being available to cover it—I think that you talked about being ready for that eventuality. What further work has been done on when the alkaline hydrolysis procedure might be available to those who receive the payment and what cross-Government work has there been on the matter? I appreciate that it touches on a number of portfolios. I wonder whether you could say something further on that.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 5 November 2024

Paul O’Kane

I hear what you have said about the longer-term work but, for the coming budget, do you expect to have seen improvements in how stakeholders feel about engagement? When you come back to the committee, will we be having a similar conversation? Will we have seen a marked improvement?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 5 November 2024

Paul O’Kane (West Scotland) (Lab)

Good morning to the minister and officials. I will explore the evidence that we heard last week on the equality and fairer Scotland budget statement. In particular, I am interested in the evidence that we heard from Oxfam, which suggested that decisions are made first and then a national outcome is assigned. The back-and-forth that I had with Oxfam last week was about taking an approach in which the outcome is the central pillar, with the spokes that come off that being all the other work that we know about. Do you agree that the approach at the moment seems to be a bit back to front?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 5 November 2024

Paul O’Kane

Given the conversation that we have just had, and reflecting on the budget in five weeks’ time, are you satisfied that the process is improving, based on your interaction with stakeholders? The pre-budget fiscal update in September was criticised as adhering poorly to the principles of human rights budgeting. It would be useful for the committee to understand the minister’s role in supporting the process that Matt Elsby just described and in the on-going work on how we increase the detail that goes to stakeholders and the explanation about the potential impact of budgetary decisions.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 5 November 2024

Paul O’Kane

I wonder whether we can touch on the budget-setting process, because it is important and relevant to our discussions this morning and to the evidence that we heard last week. The equality and fairer Scotland statement and the “Your Scotland, Your Finances” document are useful in explaining the process, but there is a sense that things happen after the fact.

Last week, there was a sense that budgetary decisions are made and a fait accompli is sent out so that the equalities measures can be scrutinised. There was also a sense of frustration and a feeling that there must be an opportunity to scrutinise and understand decisions before they are made. Does the minister recognise that? Is she willing to take on board and act on the evidence that we have heard?