The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1055 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
If you could cover the point about lone parents, that would be really helpful.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
It is encouraging that the cabinet secretary continues to seek engagement on the UK child poverty strategy, which is important. I note her comments about the delay to the strategy’s publication, but she will recognise that Governments often have to take more time in order to understand the work that they are doing. For example, publication of the Scottish Government’s medium-term financial strategy has been delayed again. The Finance and Public Administration Committee has had a number of things to say about that, and its delay has an impact on what we are discussing this morning.
The scope of the UK task force is very important. The cabinet secretary knows my view on the two-child limit: the UK Government should act on that. However, as with any task force, any proposed measures have to be paid for, and I think that that is part of the reason why more time is needed. The Scottish Government, which includes the cabinet secretary, has opposed all the UK Government’s budgetary and taxation decisions—all the revenue-raising measures in the budget have been opposed. I am keen to understand her view on how we should pay for some of the interventions if she is not in favour of the tax-raising measures in the UK budget.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
Clearly, what happens at the moment is that people often fall through the gaps. You are describing what is perhaps a more comprehensive approach to make sure that that does not happen. When considering any disadvantages of a mixed model, are there still risks of gaps in provision and the most vulnerable not being able to readily access a service?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
Throughout our inquiry, we have been looking at the mixed model as proposed in the Government’s discussion paper. We had a bit of a discussion with the previous panel on the finance and the money that is put into legal aid by the Government. Is it your view that a mixed model would save money?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
The Law Society gave evidence on its frustrations, but it also spoke about the opportunity that it sees because of where we are now and because things are beginning to move. It was hopeful that certain proposals, which I think it described as tweaks to the system, might be implemented in the summer, before the end of the parliamentary session. Are you working towards that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
Okay. The committee will be keen to follow that up.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
Over a number of weeks, including in this morning’s session, we have been discussing the mixed model of payment and delivery, which the Government’s discussion paper calls for. The sense is that it could address some of the issues of identifying and meeting needs in the current system. However, to help to inform our work, it would be useful to get a sense on what panel members’ feelings are about the advantages and disadvantages of that mixed model.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
Obviously, there are concerns about the amount of money in the system in general, and the risk with any model is that people fall through the cracks. Can you say something about what the Government is doing to ensure sufficiency of funding? I take the point about trying to move to a multiyear settlement, but what is the Government doing to ensure that people do not fall through the cracks in a mixed model?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
Funding is one part of reform, but there are larger issues. There are short-term issues and issues that appear to be longer-term, which might require legislation. Do you understand the frustrations that people have with the time that this has taken and will take? I appreciate that we need to get things right, but throughout our evidence taking, the committee has heard a degree of frustration with the slow pace and with us not achieving as much as we hoped to during this session of Parliament.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
That was a very comprehensive and helpful answer.