The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1200 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Paul O'Kane
In that case, I am wondering about the legacy of regulation that will be held over from this parliamentary session until the next session. The minister is right to say that we have to go through an election and a Government has to be formed, but do officials have a view on the timescale for the work?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Paul O'Kane
That will be useful to the committee when we write our legacy report to hand over to whoever comes next.
A number of non-Government amendments to the then Children (Scotland) Bill that were agreed to introduced various provisions, not least on child advocacy services under section 21 and alternative dispute resolution under sections 23 and 24. At the moment, there is no plan for implementing them. It would be useful if the Government placed on record its policy intention in relation to implementing those provisions. I appreciate that that will probably be done in the next parliamentary session, not this one.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Paul O'Kane
Good morning. Given the policy criticisms of the lack of regulation of child welfare reporters, implementation of the regulatory regime that is proposed for them—how that will be carried out—is important. Does the Government intend to implement the regime for child welfare reporters in this parliamentary session or the next? If it is going to be in the next session, is there a best estimate for when that will happen and come into effect?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Paul O'Kane
Good morning. I think that it is fair to say that there have been mixed views on the second national BSL plan. For example, many users have said that it lacks focus, measurable goals, timelines and accountability. It would be useful to hear your broad views on the second national BSL plan and how it assists with the development of local plans.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Paul O'Kane
That is why I asked the question. The evidence that we heard was from people who use BSL. The contention was that the users of the language must be at the heart of the process. It is useful to hear that the cabinet secretary is open to that suggestion. I am sure that the committee will want to reflect on that as part of its work.
I will hand back to the convener. I hope that those questions were substantive enough.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Paul O'Kane
There are two points in what you have just said. One is that you do not recognise that the draft plan have been watered down; however, you do recognise that such criticism has been made of it.
Rachel O’Neill from Moray house school of sport and education at the University of Edinburgh was consulted on the plan, and her research with Dr Rob Wilks of University of the West of England in Bristol was incorporated into the draft version. Their view was that recommendations had been watered down or removed, and they were disappointed with that. It would be useful for the committee to understand why that decision was taken in the final draft and why people feel that things have been watered down.
On your last point on progress being measured in tangible outcomes, a lot of the criticism is to do with there not being measurable things in the plan. There is not a sense that we will measure targets. I appreciate that you are saying today that that will be the case, but is it your view that there should be measurable outcomes?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Paul O'Kane
What was your involvement in the preparation of the national plan? What influence do you feel that you had?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Paul O'Kane
We have heard evidence from various quarters that it feels as if the national plan has been watered down and does not have the impetus that people desired in the consultation. Do you recognise that view?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Paul O'Kane
That is useful, because there is concern about a lack of central oversight of all of that. In our session with the previous panel, we had a discussion about the lack of a formal oversight body. I appreciate what the Deputy First Minister has said about the legislative constraints in that regard, and I do not want to pit BSL against Gaelic, because I am supportive of the Gaelic language, too—which we will have a wide-ranging discussion about in the chamber this afternoon—but, earlier this morning, we were told that Bòrd na Gàidhlig has a very clear role and that it often acts as the central oversight organisation. The fact that we do not have a similar body for BSL was a matter of concern for the witnesses who gave that evidence.
The Deputy First Minister has said that she is open to having a conversation about that or to a potential recommendation, but I wonder whether she might like to reflect on that comparison.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Paul O'Kane
Dr Adam, you said that the Government does not have an expert group on BSL to advise it on the plan. Is it your view that the status that Bòrd na Gàidhlig has as the national body for Gaelic should be replicated for BSL in Scotland? Is that what you are pointing to?