The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 932 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Katy Clark
We are short of time so, if other campaigners or those with lived experience have a different view or approach, it would be useful to know but, if not, perhaps the Crown Office could be asked whether it believes that safe consumption rooms are possible within the current legislative framework.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Katy Clark
I put the same question to Police Scotland. I take on board the point that local authorities might be better placed to answer this but, in Police Scotland’s experience, is the resource being put in place, given that this is a significant shift in policy?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Katy Clark
I have a question about legislation, but I am not sure whether it is appropriate to ask it at this point.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Katy Clark
My next question is about the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. The witnesses have made clear that wider social and economic issues are primary drivers of the drug problem, so the legislative framework around it is exceptionally important. People have talked about safe consumption rooms, for example, and a debate is going on about the legal framework around the issue.
In relation to the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, what kind of changes are the witnesses looking for in the legislative framework? What do they believe can be done in the current legislation? Do they argue for the devolution of drugs policy and, if so, what real changes are they looking for? I will ask some of the campaigners first. Could Peter Krykant briefly outline where he thinks we need to move in relation to the legislative framework around drugs?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Katy Clark
I will put the same question to David Liddell. Do you agree with Peter Krykant?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 October 2021
Katy Clark
My question might also be one that the witnesses feel that they are not best placed to answer. We have heard that there has been a significant increase in deferral of prosecution; indeed, as you probably know, the Lord Advocate came to Parliament fairly recently to announce a significant policy shift in relation to class A possession. Is there evidence that the resource is being put in place to ensure that we can adequately deal with that change in policy? Is there any information about the increases that we are likely to see in deferral of prosecution as a result of that policy shift, which has obviously been happening over a long period of time?
I direct those questions to the Crown Office witness. It might be that Mr McGeehan can make some comments, but will feel that the Crown Office is not best placed to give a definitive answer.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Katy Clark
Given the current crisis, are you expanding the Public Defence Solicitors Office? Are you recruiting? How does the pay compare with the pay for the types of solicitors in private practice to whom Ian Moir referred?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Katy Clark
My question is to Julia McPartlin and Ian Moir. Exactly what level of increase are you suggesting there needs to be in legal aid fees? Are you suggesting that the restructuring of legal aid to encourage pleas at an early stage would be sufficient to enable better recruitment for criminal defence agents or are you suggesting a percentage increase across the board on criminal legal aid rates? What kind of percentage is necessary now to enable you to recruit into the sector?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Katy Clark
What role might the Public Defence Solicitors Office play in a reformed legal aid system? What would the balance be between private practice and public sector provision through the PDSO?
With regard to the current crisis, is there a role for the PDSO, especially in busy courts? It may well be that, because of waiting times and so on, there are more efficient ways to deal with the problem and to ensure in the way that things are organised that solicitors are actually addressing the tasks that need done. I want to ask Colin Lancaster about that. Is there realistically a greater role for the PDSO to play in the immediate future?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Katy Clark
I ask Ian Moir to come in on that. What would make a difference? There could be an increase but it might not be sufficient for what you are arguing for. What does the Government need to do?