The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1184 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Katy Clark
My first question earlier on, however, was to ask whether you had the opportunity to consider what the DPLR Committee report said. My understanding is that you feel that you have had that opportunity. I am now asking whether you have had the opportunity to consider the particular point that was made about the drafting being wider than the policy intent. I am quite happy for an official to be brought in on that technicality, if that would be helpful.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Katy Clark
Given the nature of the issue, it would be helpful to get on record the Scottish Government position.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Katy Clark
When you refer to section 3AA, are you referring to the instrument or to the 1993 act?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Katy Clark
We have been told that, in France, the number of sex workers murdered seems to have been atypically high in the space of time immediately after the introduction of similar legislation. I am putting to you some of the things that are being said. Have you looked into that, and what is your response? Do you think that there is anything in that? You have mentioned France as one of the systems that you have looked at.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Katy Clark
We might have a time problem, but perhaps I could ask a follow-up question on alternatives to custody and the role of local government.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Katy Clark
That would be helpful, or perhaps you could share it with the committee later.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Katy Clark
I am a member of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee, and we discussed the issue at great length yesterday. We were looking at it from a technical rather than a policy point of view, so my questions will relate to the technicalities rather than to the policy. It was concerning that there were a number of grounds on which issues were raised about the way that the SSI has been drafted—those were not in any way to do with the policy intent.
Given that the issue was discussed only yesterday in the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee, I suspect that the cabinet secretary may not have had the opportunity to read the report, because it has just been published. I do not know what discussions have been taking place behind the scenes, but it seems regrettable that the Scottish Government has drafted the statutory instrument in the way that it has done, if it was possible to obtain the same policy outcome in a different way.
The committee concluded that
“the creation by subordinate legislation of a new power to make subordinate legislation is unusual, and is generally undesirable because Parliament is unable to scrutinise and amend the proposal in the way it would if proposed in a bill.”
It also concluded that
“using an ancillary power to create a new power to make subordinate legislation is particularly unusual”.
It made that point in a number of ways at a number of points in the report in relation to different aspects of the drafting. Has the cabinet secretary had the opportunity to look at the issue properly, given the timescales?
This is not about the Scottish Government’s policy intent—it is just about the drafting. If it was possible for the legislation to be drafted in a different way, that would seem to be preferable.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Katy Clark
If we take women working on the street, who I think you would agree are a more vulnerable group, some of the evidence seems to suggest, or some people are arguing, what you are proposing gives women in that situation less time to negotiate and to check. That is presumably an argument that you have had put to you. What is your response to that? Why are we are being told that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Katy Clark
If concerns are being raised with the drafting and, indeed, with the legality of the SSI and whether there is a gap between the policy intent and the drafting, it is appropriate that the Scottish Government—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Katy Clark
Is that something—