The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 934 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Katy Clark
Surely, in a murder case, which is a very serious case, the Crown will proceed if there is sufficiency of evidence. That would be the test that it would apply in a murder case.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Katy Clark
You are saying that you do not think that single-judge trials are the solution. Is there any solution if you believe that it is inevitable that conviction rates will be lower for rape? Is there anything that this Parliament should do to change how the process works in order to improve conviction rates, given that we know that there is a sufficiency of evidence in the cases that are taken forward by the Crown?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Katy Clark
That is not what is being said. I have one final question. You said:
“There will, inevitably, be lower conviction rates”.
Are you saying that there will be similar conviction rates whether you have a jury or a judge-only case?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Katy Clark
My question is for Gordon MacRae and Gavin Smith, because I believe that their organisations are represented on the homelessness prevention task and finish group. As they will know, the Scottish Government’s response to the task group’s recommendations prioritised action that would have the greatest impact on reducing the numbers of households in temporary accommodation. Is there anything further that you can say about how long-term measures around the recommendations would impact on other working groups—for example, on the financing of temporary accommodation?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Katy Clark
Thank you. Gavin Smith, do you want to come in on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Katy Clark
My next question is directed to Nicky Brown and Jim McBride. In the longer term, the Scottish Government plans to introduce a new statutory prevention duty. How do you envisage that impacting on demand for temporary accommodation?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Katy Clark
What is Social Security Scotland doing to ensure that all client-facing staff know how to refer clients with disabilities to VoiceAbility advocacy services?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Katy Clark
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2024
Katy Clark
Are you convinced that that is working well? Do you see any problems?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2024
Katy Clark
I would like to ask one question, if that is okay.
Lord Advocate, I completely understand that I am asking you to speculate on this. You have already indicated that you believe that the current proposals would be likely to make it more difficult to get convictions. In your view, what would be the likely impact on convictions if the not proven verdict was simply abolished without any changes to the size of juries or verdict majorities? I appreciate that I am asking you to speculate.