The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1011 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Katy Clark
I agree that there should not be a gap in hate crime legislation, so it is quite right that the Scottish Government is coming forward with proposals. Leaving aside all the debates around the misogyny bill for now—I appreciate that we may come back to that in relation to new offences and that these proposals are perhaps a different and additional approach—I note that Engender thinks that
“the hate crimes model was not designed to address the nature and scale of”
violence and discrimination against women. Moreover, the working group said that it would be very difficult to prove that a specific act had happened based on sex.
Does the cabinet secretary agree with those points? If so, how has that element been taken into account in the drafting of the SSI? Has there been consideration as to whether it is simply a matter of slotting in the word “sex”, which seems to be the case in the SSI, or whether the matter needs to be addressed in a different way, with further redrafting? Did the cabinet secretary grapple with or have discussions with officials about the issue?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Katy Clark
That is helpful. It seems that there really is not very much flexibility around that, given how the original legislation was drafted.
Perhaps you have considered, especially given some of the complexity of such issues, how the change will be addressed in the training of the police and other agencies that are responsible for implementing the new provision. Has there been discussion about that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Katy Clark
It is not just about throughcare—I have raised the experience of prisoners both serving their sentences and coming to their release. There seem to be inconsistencies of approach throughout the estate. Is it fair to say that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Katy Clark
I want to come in on a different issue.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Katy Clark
Without focusing on the specific example that I mentioned, as it might be an extreme one, can you give us a bit more information about how possession of drugs is dealt with in prisons? It might have all sorts of consequences, including on length of sentence.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Katy Clark
Is the fact that we have such inconsistency of practice due to a lack of resource, or is it a cultural or organisational problem? I do not know whether Suzy Calder has a view on that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Katy Clark
The committee has met small groups of former prisoners in private to discuss their experiences of drugs in prisons, and one of the people whom we met told us that, originally, he had been expected to serve a nine-year sentence but, in reality, had served 27 years in prison due to drug issues and drug use. Do you recognise that scenario? Will you tell us a bit more about how possession of drugs is dealt with in the prison system? Perhaps Linda Pollock might be the best person to come in on that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Katy Clark
So it is treated as a criminal matter. I understand.
We have heard a lot of evidence of inconsistency of practice across prisons and, in particular, inconsistency of provision of medication, recovery and other support services. The Scottish Recovery Consortium has said that there should be a minimum set of standards across prisons. What is your response to that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Katy Clark
You have made the point about access and organisation more than once in your evidence today, and we have also heard a lot of evidence about the lack of continuity of care and inconsistencies throughout the system in relation to throughcare and release. We have heard many examples of very good practice in some prisons, but clearly it is not uniform, and there are some very bad examples, too. Can you tell us a little bit about how you think good practice can be shared across the estate?
Perhaps you can also pick up some of the points that have already been made about whether the problem is lack of resource or cultural, and about whether we are not organising ourselves well enough to ensure that we are able to deliver, for example, the throughcare and release planning that is needed. As we know, the evidence shows that the more planning for release that is done, the more successful that release is and the less reoffending that takes place.
Who would like to respond to that?
10:45Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Katy Clark
I would like to declare an interest, in that I am a member of the House of Lords, on leave of absence.