The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1184 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Katy Clark
As the minister is probably aware, the bill has been drafted on the basis of work over several parliamentary sessions; a number of consultations; the work of this committee in the previous session; the recommendations of four information commissioners over the long period of time since the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 was enacted; the views of stakeholders such as FOI officers at events that I know you attend, who are asking that they be put on a statutory footing that is similar to, and mirrored on, data protection, in order to give them more authority to require their organisations to comply with the law; and the views of campaigning organisations and many others that I could list. The bill is an attempt to capture discussions that have taken place for a long time.
Do you accept that the reason why we are discussing this bill is the Scottish Government’s failure to respond to those calls for reform, most recently the post-legislative scrutiny report in 2020 and the consultation in 2023? Therefore, do you accept that there is a lack of confidence that the Scottish Government is driving or will drive the changes that are needed?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Katy Clark
Many of the bodies that were designated in 2002 were complex. For example, general practices make up a wide range of different bodies. My essential point is that we need to speed up the process, don’t we?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Katy Clark
As I said, we designated 10,000 bodies in 2002, and they were often similarly complex. The question really is whether you accept that we need to speed up the pace of designation.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Katy Clark
So, only very recently. Do you accept that there is also a great deal of concern about the pace of designation since 2002, particularly given the changing nature of how public services are delivered with outsourcing? On occasion, as we have heard in evidence, that has led to a loss of rights. We have taken evidence today about changes in technology. The Scottish Parliament designated 10,000 bodies in 2002, when the act was passed, but, as we have heard, since then, the pace of designation has been described as “glacial”. Do you accept that we need to speed up the pace of designation, given the loss of rights and that the public have a right to know how their money is being spent?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Katy Clark
Thank you.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Katy Clark
I appreciate your evidence in relation to the work that you have personally been involved in to extend FOI. I appreciate that you have been back in your role—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Katy Clark
Minister, you said that this is a difficult issue. Do you agree that, for a long time, the issue has been put in a box that is labelled “too difficult”? You said that you agree with the general terms of the legislation that is before the Parliament and the general principles of its various provisions, but that you believe that amendments are necessary because there are significant concerns about the drafting of the bill. Do you agree that it is our responsibility to work on the bill to get the drafting in the right place?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Katy Clark
So, the issue is about checks—you think that that aspect needs further exploration and discussion.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Katy Clark
That is part of the bill. Do you have a position on it?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Katy Clark
It is a policy position.