The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
Finally, there have been 350 deaths in custody since 2012, and 23 this year alone. You were due to meet the Cabinet Secretary for NHS Recovery, Health and Social Care and the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs in August, but the meeting was cancelled. You were then due to meet them in September, and that meeting was cancelled. A new meeting has been scheduled for 21 November. Do you know why those meetings were cancelled? That does not suggest to me that there is any great urgency to sit down and work out what needs to happen.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
To come back to the point about the aggravator, I note that the minister said that the Government will
“publish more detailed statistical information”
at some point “Later this year”. It would be nice to know when that will be. There is quite a lot of evidence in the report from witnesses saying that the aggravator has not been used properly and that it is not clear when and how it is being used. It is hard to assess how well it is being used. The frustration is that the Government could not get the data, so it would be nice to pin it down a bit more on that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
Thank you very much.
11:00Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
Concerns have been raised about that for almost a decade.
Where is the reluctance coming from? Is it the Scottish Government, the Crown Office or both? Is it coming from the blob? What is the problem with fixing the FAI process when it is clear that it is fundamentally flawed?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
Will it take ministers to start insisting that the Crown accepts that there is a problem and does something about it?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
However, there is nothing stopping any Government from saying to the Crown Office, notwithstanding the Lord Advocate’s independence and the Crown’s independence, that it could impose, create or fix a system without impinging on that independence.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
I have a few points to make. One of the most important is on the statutory aggravator relating to the involvement of a child in a domestic abuse incident. Our report, which made eight recommendations, is perhaps key. We said that that aggravator is not really being measured, and that it is not clear how well it is being used; we do not really know. It is hard to work out the detail, and it is not entirely clear how that aggravator is being used. The response to that point in the report is a little bit vague. It talks in generalities and does not really say what exactly the Government is doing to address the issue.
My second point relates to communication to the public. Our report also made the recommendation that the previous public awareness campaign was quite effective, and it suggested that something similar could be done again, because people might not realise what the legislation does. Again, the word that I have used in my notes to describe the response from the minister is “vague.” The Government’s response says:
“There is consideration of a campaign to address these issues.”
It would be nice to know whether something material is happening in respect of both those points.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
Maybe the Government does not want to go down that road and maybe there are no plans to do so; in that case, it should just tell us.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
Maybe this is clear, but I do not know whether we know and, more important, whether the public know, what the timeline is for implementation of the legislation, which was brought in quite quickly on the basis of needing to address the issue of proxy purchasing of fireworks for under-18s. The expected timelines for implementation of firework control zones, licensing and so on have already been put back.
I think that there was a suggestion in the letter from the minister that it is still the Government’s intention to implement a key part of the legislation this year—I think that it was the provision on firework control zones—but it seems to be pretty unlikely that that is going to happen, given that we do not know what different authorities are doing and how that looks. Are we up to speed on a timeline? Forgive me if we are, and I do not know that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Russell Findlay
I have a very quick question for Mr Haggart. I asked you previously about the electric fire engine that had been bought and deployed to Cambuslang. The most recent position from the Scottish ministers was that it was due to enter service this summer. Has it done so, has that incurred additional cost and do you plan to purchase more of those?