The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Russell Findlay
As far as we know, that has been decided—is that correct?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
I have two very quick questions. First, the Scottish Government will be watching this evidence session and will have read your submissions. If it were possible for your tenure to be extended for, say, 12 months, would you consider staying on, or are you completely scunnered and have you had enough? Is staying on an option?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
First, I go back to the chronology of events. The Scottish Government commissioned the review in November 2021—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
In 2019—sorry. The review then reported in November 2021.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
However, if I understand correctly, you are of the view that that would not be necessary if the fatal accident inquiry system was fixed.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
Paragraph 89 of our report mentions that we took evidence about how, with some domestic abuse cases that are being heard in the criminal courts, a civil case is running in tandem. Often, an abuser will use one or the other to continue the abuse, so our recommendation was that the Government consider and come back with a view on using a single-sheriff model when civil and criminal cases operate simultaneously. The response from the cabinet secretary is not satisfactory. It talks generally about “joined-up” thinking and uses the dreaded phrase, “a series of workshops.” It does not say whether the Government agrees or disagrees with the proposal, even in principle, and it does not give any indication as to what will happen next—if anything. The response ends by talking about child contact centres, which is a completely different subject and therefore looks like padding.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
I will return to the fundamentals. The fatal accident inquiry system is central to investigating deaths in custody, but you and others involved in the review were told that you could not even look at that system. You, quite rightly, said that that was ridiculous and you did look at it. Uniquely, the Crown Office seems to think that fatal accident inquiries are fine, despite the abundance of evidence of all the misery and pain that they cause, in addition to that caused by the deaths that have occurred.
Given the reluctance or the inability to fix the FAI system, we are left with one key recommendation—one that you would rather not be enacted but that is surely the direction of travel and that, at some point, might be enacted. Has any work been done on, or have there been any discussions about, the cost of setting up a new organisation that would deal specifically with deaths in custody?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
It is now almost two years since then. The report contained 19 recommendations and six advisory points. To be clear, of those 25 in total, almost two years later, only five have been implemented.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
Five out of 26. How do you feel about that? Do you feel frustration or surprise? What are your thoughts?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Russell Findlay
If I understood your opening statement correctly, the key recommendation of the report is that there should be an entirely new system of investigating deaths in custody.