The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Russell Findlay
I have two questions, the first of which relates to part 1 and the second of which relates to part 3.
The committee received evidence from Joe Duffy, who is the father of Amanda Duffy, who was murdered many years ago. He has campaigned tirelessly for use of the not proven verdict to be ended. In his submission, he made comments on the creation of a victims commissioner, to which he is opposed. He said:
“The creation of this post will create yet another level of unnecessary bureaucracy within the Criminal Justice Process.
There are limited funding and resources currently within criminal justice Scotland and we believe this appointment would adversely impact resources”.
He went on to say more along those lines. What would you say in response to him and others who share those concerns?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Russell Findlay
Evidence that we heard suggested that, in situations where an individual was facing criminal proceedings of a domestic or sexual nature and, in tandem—as is often the case—was involved in civil cases relating to the custody of or access to children, you could overcome those competing factors and what is often a further traumatising process by having one sheriff deal with both sets of proceedings, civil and criminal.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Russell Findlay
Thank you.
Cabinet secretary, when was the bill first named the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill? Was there an original name for it?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Russell Findlay
My first question is on part 5 of the bill. The policy memorandum talks about staff training, improving case management, improving efficiency and reducing delays—all of which are noble aims—but victims might ask why doing any of that needs legislation. There is a risk that the bill might come across as a very expensive exercise in rebranding the courts. Could you explain that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Russell Findlay
Some of what you refer to is in part 6—for example, independent legal representation for victims when section 275 applications are made.
You talk about the need to define “trauma-informed practice”, but the legislation does not do that; it simply says that the Lord President will decide at a later date what those arrangements will be. Why can that not just be done by the Lord President or by the courts already, without legislation, since the legislation does not specify what it is?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Russell Findlay
To understand the issue, I will put it in simple layman’s terms. Are you saying that the Scottish Government’s motivation was not to improve or change conviction rates, but that the study suggested that that was a likely consequence?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Russell Findlay
I am still not entirely clear about whether the proposed changes are likely to change conviction rates.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Russell Findlay
I am not saying that they are designed to do that—it is not about the intent; it is about whether the research shows that that is a likely consequence. That is not clear.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Russell Findlay
Part 3 is on special measures in civil cases. The committee has heard evidence of cases in which male abusers have used the civil courts in tandem with criminal proceedings to inflict further harm and abuse on their victims. It was suggested to us by various victims groups that a single-sheriff model could be brought into force whereby, if criminal and civil cases were running in tandem, they could be heard by one sheriff, who would be across everything and would be aware of such harm and abuse going on. Was any consideration given to that form of reform? Might there be scope to introduce such reform in future, even in the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Russell Findlay
Thank you.