The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Russell Findlay
I am sorry.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Russell Findlay
That is fine. Thank you, convener. I have finished.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Russell Findlay
Anyone else can come in if they want, but I am mindful of time.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Russell Findlay
Yes, I will come in very quickly on the trauma-informed issue.
The written evidence from Children 1st talks about the limited number of agencies that will have to
“have regard to ... trauma-informed practice”.
The bill does not include in that the judiciary and the children’s hearings system, which is going to be expanded. Not only do you want that provision to be expanded to include them, but you want to change the wording “have regard”, in order to tighten or strengthen it in some way. Is that an easy fix for the legislation?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Russell Findlay
Yes, one would have thought so. Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Russell Findlay
The written evidence on that issue is overwhelmingly powerful and clear, but I will ask another question in a similar vein. We know that some abusers weaponise the justice system to continue their abuse by launching costly—emotionally and financially—and often spurious civil proceedings in tandem with criminal cases, and then use those parallel processes to seek delays to one another, which adds to the distress.
In its written submission, Rape Crisis says that civil courts should
“stop their processes being used as a means of abuse.”
There has been discussion about the proposal of a single sheriff dealing with cases where there are civil and criminal cases in tandem. The cabinet secretary, when we raised that with her last week, seemed reasonably receptive to the concept. I think that you agree with that model—we have heard that before. Could the bill be amended to make that happen, and if so, how? As Dr Scott has been most vocal on the issue, perhaps it is a question for her.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Russell Findlay
Thank you. I am conscious of time, so I will stop there.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Russell Findlay
We have a huge amount of ground to cover but, due to the time limits, I will just ask one question, which is specifically about floating trial diets for sexual offence cases. Rape Crisis Scotland’s evidence says that the bill needs to include a specific
“commitment to dispense with floating trial diets in rape and sexual offence cases”
as they cause uncertainty, distress, disruption and trauma; they are not trauma-informed practice. Victim Support Scotland, similarly, says that it is “strongly opposed” to those floating trial diets.
In his review of that practice, Lord Bonomy recommended that such diets should not happen in rape cases. That was 21 years ago. I find it inexplicable that they are still happening 21 years later. Given that the bill is a victims bill, will it lead to those trial diets ending? If not, can it be amended to make that happen? The question relates to both organisations’ evidence, so it is perhaps for Kate Wallace and Sandy Brindley.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Russell Findlay
I note that that does not need to be part of the sexual offences proposals. It can and should just be done with an amendment to the bill.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2023
Russell Findlay
I have a general question. Children 1st’s written evidence states:
“We are extremely concerned that large amounts of important legislation and policies are being introduced without any clear mechanisms, intention, or resources to implement in full.”
Children 1st went on to say:
“Attention and energy needs to be directed towards getting legislation that has already been passed implemented to make the intended difference.”
You have touched on that already. Two specific acts were cited: the Children (Scotland) Act 2020, large parts of which are still not in force, and the Vulnerable Witnesses (Criminal Evidence) (Scotland) Act 2019, which would allow all children to give pre-recorded evidence. That is still only at the early stages of being phased in.
Do you have confidence that the bill, if passed, will be implemented in a timely manner, or is there a risk that it will join the others in the legislation limbo? If that is a risk, what can we do about it? Are there amendments that would make a practical difference?